Re: [PATCH RFC] net/ipv4: Use next hop exceptions also for input routes
flat view
From: Timo Teras <hidden>
Date: 2013-05-26 09:39:57
On Sun, 26 May 2013 00:03:04 -0700 (PDT) David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Timo Teräs <redacted> Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 16:15:46 +0300quoted
Commit d2d68ba9 (ipv4: Cache input routes in fib_info nexthops) assmued that "locally destined, and routed packets, never trigger PMTU events or redirects that will be processed by us". However, it seems that tunnel devices do trigger PMTU events in certain cases. At least ip_gre, ip6_gre, sit, and ipip do use the inner flow's skb_dst(skb)->ops->update_pmtu to propage mtu information from the outer flows. These can cause the inner flow mtu to be decreased. If next hop exceptions are not consulted for pmtu, IP fragmentation will not be done properly for these routes. It also seems that we really need to have the PMTU information always for netfilter TCPMSS' clamp-to-pmtu feature to work properly. So for the time being, cache separate copies of input routes for each next hop exception. Signed-off-by: Timo Teräs <redacted>Thanks for working on this Timo, I am actively reviewing this change and thinking about alternatives.
Thanks, I did notice one problems in further testing. The symptom is that once learned pmtu expires, it is not refreshed by fragments. This seems to be a dst caching issue. Fundamentally it seems to be same problem that commit 05ab86c5 (xfrm4: Invalidate all ipv4 routes on IPsec pmtu events) tried to fix by flushing everything. This some problem now happens with ip_gre bound inner flows as the pmtu is locally generated and not received from internet to the esp/ah packets. I believe the flush all approach is not necessary and we can do better. I basically have new patch set pending testing. I'll post the new patch set sometime in next few days.