[PATCH net-next V2 3/3] xen-netback: better names for thresholds
From: Wei Liu <hidden>
Date: 2013-05-02 10:44:02
Subsystem:
networking drivers, the rest, xen network backend driver · Maintainers:
Andrew Lunn, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds, Wei Liu, Paul Durrant
This patch only changes some names to avoid confusion. In this patch we have: MAX_SKB_SLOTS_DEFAULT -> FATAL_SKB_SLOTS_DEFAULT max_skb_slots -> fatal_skb_slots #define XEN_NETBK_LEGACY_SLOTS_MAX XEN_NETIF_NR_SLOTS_MIN The fatal_skb_slots is the threshold to determine whether a packet is malicious. XEN_NETBK_LEGACY_SLOTS_MAX is the maximum slots a valid packet can have at this point. It is defined to be XEN_NETIF_NR_SLOTS_MIN because that's guaranteed to be supported by all backends. Suggested-by: Ian Campbell <redacted> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <redacted> --- drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
index ce8109f..37984e6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
+++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c@@ -51,9 +51,17 @@ * This is the maximum slots a skb can have. If a guest sends a skb * which exceeds this limit it is considered malicious. */ -#define MAX_SKB_SLOTS_DEFAULT 20 -static unsigned int max_skb_slots = MAX_SKB_SLOTS_DEFAULT; -module_param(max_skb_slots, uint, 0444); +#define FATAL_SKB_SLOTS_DEFAULT 20 +static unsigned int fatal_skb_slots = FATAL_SKB_SLOTS_DEFAULT; +module_param(fatal_skb_slots, uint, 0444); + +/* + * To avoid confusion, we define XEN_NETBK_LEGACY_SLOTS_MAX indicating + * the maximum slots a valid packet can use. Now this value is defined + * to be XEN_NETIF_NR_SLOTS_MIN, which is supposed to be supported by + * all backend. + */ +#define XEN_NETBK_LEGACY_SLOTS_MAX XEN_NETIF_NR_SLOTS_MIN typedef unsigned int pending_ring_idx_t; #define INVALID_PENDING_RING_IDX (~0U)
@@ -953,25 +961,26 @@ static int netbk_count_requests(struct xenvif *vif, /* This guest is really using too many slots and * considered malicious. */ - if (unlikely(slots >= max_skb_slots)) { + if (unlikely(slots >= fatal_skb_slots)) { netdev_err(vif->dev, "Malicious frontend using %d slots, threshold %u\n", - slots, max_skb_slots); + slots, fatal_skb_slots); netbk_fatal_tx_err(vif); return -E2BIG; } /* Xen network protocol had implicit dependency on - * MAX_SKB_FRAGS. XEN_NETIF_NR_SLOTS_MIN is set to the - * historical MAX_SKB_FRAGS value 18 to honor the same - * behavior as before. Any packet using more than 18 - * slots but less than max_skb_slots slots is dropped + * MAX_SKB_FRAGS. XEN_NETBK_LEGACY_SLOTS_MAX is set to + * the historical MAX_SKB_FRAGS value 18 to honor the + * same behavior as before. Any packet using more than + * 18 slots but less than fatal_skb_slots slots is + * dropped */ - if (!drop_err && slots >= XEN_NETIF_NR_SLOTS_MIN) { + if (!drop_err && slots >= XEN_NETBK_LEGACY_SLOTS_MAX) { if (net_ratelimit()) netdev_dbg(vif->dev, "Too many slots (%d) exceeding limit (%d), dropping packet\n", - slots, XEN_NETIF_NR_SLOTS_MIN); + slots, XEN_NETBK_LEGACY_SLOTS_MAX); drop_err = -E2BIG; }
@@ -1053,7 +1062,7 @@ static struct gnttab_copy *xen_netbk_get_requests(struct xen_netbk *netbk, struct pending_tx_info *first = NULL; /* At this point shinfo->nr_frags is in fact the number of - * slots, which can be as large as XEN_NETIF_NR_SLOTS_MIN. + * slots, which can be as large as XEN_NETBK_LEGACY_SLOTS_MAX. */ nr_slots = shinfo->nr_frags;
@@ -1415,12 +1424,12 @@ static unsigned xen_netbk_tx_build_gops(struct xen_netbk *netbk) struct sk_buff *skb; int ret; - while ((nr_pending_reqs(netbk) + XEN_NETIF_NR_SLOTS_MIN + while ((nr_pending_reqs(netbk) + XEN_NETBK_LEGACY_SLOTS_MAX < MAX_PENDING_REQS) && !list_empty(&netbk->net_schedule_list)) { struct xenvif *vif; struct xen_netif_tx_request txreq; - struct xen_netif_tx_request txfrags[XEN_NETIF_NR_SLOTS_MIN]; + struct xen_netif_tx_request txfrags[XEN_NETBK_LEGACY_SLOTS_MAX]; struct page *page; struct xen_netif_extra_info extras[XEN_NETIF_EXTRA_TYPE_MAX-1]; u16 pending_idx;
@@ -1508,7 +1517,7 @@ static unsigned xen_netbk_tx_build_gops(struct xen_netbk *netbk) pending_idx = netbk->pending_ring[index]; data_len = (txreq.size > PKT_PROT_LEN && - ret < XEN_NETIF_NR_SLOTS_MIN) ? + ret < XEN_NETBK_LEGACY_SLOTS_MAX) ? PKT_PROT_LEN : txreq.size; skb = alloc_skb(data_len + NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN,
@@ -1787,7 +1796,7 @@ static inline int rx_work_todo(struct xen_netbk *netbk) static inline int tx_work_todo(struct xen_netbk *netbk) { - if ((nr_pending_reqs(netbk) + XEN_NETIF_NR_SLOTS_MIN + if ((nr_pending_reqs(netbk) + XEN_NETBK_LEGACY_SLOTS_MAX < MAX_PENDING_REQS) && !list_empty(&netbk->net_schedule_list)) return 1;
@@ -1872,11 +1881,11 @@ static int __init netback_init(void) if (!xen_domain()) return -ENODEV; - if (max_skb_slots < XEN_NETIF_NR_SLOTS_MIN) { + if (fatal_skb_slots < XEN_NETBK_LEGACY_SLOTS_MAX) { printk(KERN_INFO - "xen-netback: max_skb_slots too small (%d), bump it to XEN_NETIF_NR_SLOTS_MIN (%d)\n", - max_skb_slots, XEN_NETIF_NR_SLOTS_MIN); - max_skb_slots = XEN_NETIF_NR_SLOTS_MIN; + "xen-netback: fatal_skb_slots too small (%d), bump it to XEN_NETBK_LEGACY_SLOTS_MAX (%d)\n", + fatal_skb_slots, XEN_NETBK_LEGACY_SLOTS_MAX); + fatal_skb_slots = XEN_NETBK_LEGACY_SLOTS_MAX; } xen_netbk_group_nr = num_online_cpus();
--
1.7.10.4