[PATCH] phy: Add XGMII phy interface type · Ben Collins <hidden> · 2013-03-22
Re: [PATCH] phy: Add XGMII phy interface type · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2013-03-22
Re: [PATCH] phy: Add XGMII phy interface type · Ben Collins <hidden> · 2013-03-22
Re: [PATCH] phy: Add XGMII phy interface type · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2013-03-22
Re: [PATCH] phy: Add XGMII phy interface type · Ben Collins <hidden> · 2013-03-22
Re: [PATCH] phy: Add XGMII phy interface type · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2013-03-22
Re: [PATCH] phy: Add XGMII phy interface type · Ben Collins <hidden> · 2013-03-22

Re: [PATCH] phy: Add XGMII phy interface type

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2013-03-22 14:19:05
Also in: lkml

From: Ben Collins <redacted>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:17:35 -0400

On Mar 22, 2013, at 10:12 AM, David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

From: Ben Collins <redacted>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:53:42 -0400

quoted

Used by systems based on certain Freescale SoCs (specifically the
Servergy CTS-1000 system).

Signed-off-by: Ben Collins <redacted>

You can resubmit this patch when you submit a driver upstream that
uses it, so we can see what the use case looks like.

That patch is getting sent soon. It's starting out in staging. Should I Cc you on that?

Why don't you wait until the driver is good enough for drivers/net proper?