Thread (42 messages) 42 messages, 5 authors, 2013-04-02
STALE4826d

[PATCH 12/34] ipvs: convert locks used in persistence engines

From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Date: 2013-03-29 04:11:29
Also in: lvs-devel, netfilter-devel
Subsystem: ipvs, netfilter, networking [general], the rest · Maintainers: Simon Horman, Julian Anastasov, Pablo Neira Ayuso, Florian Westphal, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds

From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>

Allow the readers to use RCU lock and for
PE module registrations use global mutex instead of
spinlock. All PE modules need to use synchronize_rcu
in their module exit handler.

Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Signed-off by: Hans Schillstrom [off-list ref]
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
---
 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe.c     |   43 +++++++++++--------------------------
 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe_sip.c |    1 +
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe.c
index 5cf859c..5d9774c 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe.c
@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@
 /* IPVS pe list */
 static LIST_HEAD(ip_vs_pe);
 
-/* lock for service table */
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ip_vs_pe_lock);
+/* semaphore for IPVS PEs. */
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(ip_vs_pe_mutex);
 
 /* Bind a service with a pe */
 void ip_vs_bind_pe(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct ip_vs_pe *pe)
@@ -36,9 +36,8 @@ struct ip_vs_pe *__ip_vs_pe_getbyname(const char *pe_name)
 	IP_VS_DBG(10, "%s(): pe_name \"%s\"\n", __func__,
 		  pe_name);
 
-	spin_lock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock);
-
-	list_for_each_entry(pe, &ip_vs_pe, n_list) {
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(pe, &ip_vs_pe, n_list) {
 		/* Test and get the modules atomically */
 		if (pe->module &&
 		    !try_module_get(pe->module)) {
@@ -47,14 +46,14 @@ struct ip_vs_pe *__ip_vs_pe_getbyname(const char *pe_name)
 		}
 		if (strcmp(pe_name, pe->name)==0) {
 			/* HIT */
-			spin_unlock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock);
+			rcu_read_unlock();
 			return pe;
 		}
 		if (pe->module)
 			module_put(pe->module);
 	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
-	spin_unlock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock);
 	return NULL;
 }
 
@@ -83,22 +82,13 @@ int register_ip_vs_pe(struct ip_vs_pe *pe)
 	/* increase the module use count */
 	ip_vs_use_count_inc();
 
-	spin_lock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock);
-
-	if (!list_empty(&pe->n_list)) {
-		spin_unlock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock);
-		ip_vs_use_count_dec();
-		pr_err("%s(): [%s] pe already linked\n",
-		       __func__, pe->name);
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
+	mutex_lock(&ip_vs_pe_mutex);
 	/* Make sure that the pe with this name doesn't exist
 	 * in the pe list.
 	 */
 	list_for_each_entry(tmp, &ip_vs_pe, n_list) {
 		if (strcmp(tmp->name, pe->name) == 0) {
-			spin_unlock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock);
+			mutex_unlock(&ip_vs_pe_mutex);
 			ip_vs_use_count_dec();
 			pr_err("%s(): [%s] pe already existed "
 			       "in the system\n", __func__, pe->name);
@@ -106,8 +96,8 @@ int register_ip_vs_pe(struct ip_vs_pe *pe)
 		}
 	}
 	/* Add it into the d-linked pe list */
-	list_add(&pe->n_list, &ip_vs_pe);
-	spin_unlock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock);
+	list_add_rcu(&pe->n_list, &ip_vs_pe);
+	mutex_unlock(&ip_vs_pe_mutex);
 
 	pr_info("[%s] pe registered.\n", pe->name);
 
@@ -118,17 +108,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(register_ip_vs_pe);
 /* Unregister a pe from the pe list */
 int unregister_ip_vs_pe(struct ip_vs_pe *pe)
 {
-	spin_lock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock);
-	if (list_empty(&pe->n_list)) {
-		spin_unlock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock);
-		pr_err("%s(): [%s] pe is not in the list. failed\n",
-		       __func__, pe->name);
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help