[PATCH 12/34] ipvs: convert locks used in persistence engines
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Date: 2013-03-29 04:11:29
Also in:
lvs-devel, netfilter-devel
Subsystem:
ipvs, netfilter, networking [general], the rest · Maintainers:
Simon Horman, Julian Anastasov, Pablo Neira Ayuso, Florian Westphal, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> Allow the readers to use RCU lock and for PE module registrations use global mutex instead of spinlock. All PE modules need to use synchronize_rcu in their module exit handler. Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> Signed-off by: Hans Schillstrom [off-list ref] Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> --- net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe.c | 43 +++++++++++-------------------------- net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe_sip.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe.c
index 5cf859c..5d9774c 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe.c@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ /* IPVS pe list */ static LIST_HEAD(ip_vs_pe); -/* lock for service table */ -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ip_vs_pe_lock); +/* semaphore for IPVS PEs. */ +static DEFINE_MUTEX(ip_vs_pe_mutex); /* Bind a service with a pe */ void ip_vs_bind_pe(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct ip_vs_pe *pe)
@@ -36,9 +36,8 @@ struct ip_vs_pe *__ip_vs_pe_getbyname(const char *pe_name) IP_VS_DBG(10, "%s(): pe_name \"%s\"\n", __func__, pe_name); - spin_lock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock); - - list_for_each_entry(pe, &ip_vs_pe, n_list) { + rcu_read_lock(); + list_for_each_entry_rcu(pe, &ip_vs_pe, n_list) { /* Test and get the modules atomically */ if (pe->module && !try_module_get(pe->module)) {
@@ -47,14 +46,14 @@ struct ip_vs_pe *__ip_vs_pe_getbyname(const char *pe_name) } if (strcmp(pe_name, pe->name)==0) { /* HIT */ - spin_unlock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock); + rcu_read_unlock(); return pe; } if (pe->module) module_put(pe->module); } + rcu_read_unlock(); - spin_unlock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock); return NULL; }
@@ -83,22 +82,13 @@ int register_ip_vs_pe(struct ip_vs_pe *pe) /* increase the module use count */ ip_vs_use_count_inc(); - spin_lock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock); - - if (!list_empty(&pe->n_list)) { - spin_unlock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock); - ip_vs_use_count_dec(); - pr_err("%s(): [%s] pe already linked\n", - __func__, pe->name); - return -EINVAL; - } - + mutex_lock(&ip_vs_pe_mutex); /* Make sure that the pe with this name doesn't exist * in the pe list. */ list_for_each_entry(tmp, &ip_vs_pe, n_list) { if (strcmp(tmp->name, pe->name) == 0) { - spin_unlock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock); + mutex_unlock(&ip_vs_pe_mutex); ip_vs_use_count_dec(); pr_err("%s(): [%s] pe already existed " "in the system\n", __func__, pe->name);
@@ -106,8 +96,8 @@ int register_ip_vs_pe(struct ip_vs_pe *pe) } } /* Add it into the d-linked pe list */ - list_add(&pe->n_list, &ip_vs_pe); - spin_unlock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock); + list_add_rcu(&pe->n_list, &ip_vs_pe); + mutex_unlock(&ip_vs_pe_mutex); pr_info("[%s] pe registered.\n", pe->name);
@@ -118,17 +108,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(register_ip_vs_pe); /* Unregister a pe from the pe list */ int unregister_ip_vs_pe(struct ip_vs_pe *pe) { - spin_lock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock); - if (list_empty(&pe->n_list)) { - spin_unlock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock); - pr_err("%s(): [%s] pe is not in the list. failed\n", - __func__, pe->name); - return -EINVAL; - }