Kees Cook [off-list ref] writes:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Eric W. Biederman
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Kees Cook [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
The patch would not break it -- it defaults the sysctl to staying enabled.
If you mean the documentation should be updated, sure, that's easy to do.
David: I know you aren't a fan of this patch, but I'd like to try to
convince you. :) This leaves the feature enabled and add a toggle for
systems (like Chrome OS) that don't want to risk this DoS at all.
There are so very many other toggle, I don't see why this one would be
a problem to add.
Chrome OS has no plans to implement webrtc? Last I had read that
support had been added to the release versions of Chrome, and was in the
development builds of firefox. I really don't belive that there are
many systems that don't intend to run a web browser.
I haven't looked at the internals of webrtc. Are you implying some
feature in it relies on the TCP simultaneous connect?
I am saying that yes.
webrtc is built on ICE (interactivity connectivity establishment). ICE
support for TCP (RFC6544) uses TCP simultaneous connect. webrtc
supports tcp connections.
Eric