Re: pull-request: can-next 2013-01-26
From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Date: 2013-01-28 05:58:32
Also in:
linux-can
On 28.01.2013 06:24, David Miller wrote:
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 17:09:07 +0100quoted
this is a pull-request for net-next/master. There is are 9 patches by Fabio Baltieri and Kurt Van Dijck which add LED infrastructure and support for CAN devices. Bernd Krumboeck adds a driver for the USB CAN adapter from 8 devices. Oliver Hartkopp improves the CAN gateway functionality. There are 4 patches by me, which clean up the CAN's Kconfig.Pulled, although: 1) You need to create an accessor helper for that can_skb_priv thing, every access to it is that horrible cast expression.
Ok, will do.
2) There is no reason to accomodate out of tree stuff, and for that reason I see no reason why you should need that headroom size check at all. Either the driver uses alloc_can_skb() or it does it's own SKB allocation and in-tree you've fixed that. You're just asking for trouble by trying to accomodate out of tree guys anyways, why if they create a headroom that happens to be the size of can_skb_priv. See what a joke that test is? It's not really protecting fully against anything.
I see. I'll remove the check and try to inform the few out of tree guys that i'm aware of. Thanks, Oliver