Thread (50 messages) 50 messages, 6 authors, 2013-03-22

Re: [PATCH 4/5] net: mvmdio: allow Device Tree and platform device to coexist

From: Jason Gunthorpe <hidden>
Date: 2013-01-29 17:59:27
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, linuxppc-dev, lkml

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 04:24:07PM +0100, Florian Fainelli wrote:
  
-	dev->err_interrupt = irq_of_parse_and_map(pdev->dev.of_node, 0);
+	if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
+		dev->regs = of_iomap(pdev->dev.of_node, 0);
+		if (!dev->regs) {
+			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No SMI register address given in DT\n");
+			ret = -ENODEV;
+			goto out_free;
+		}
+
+		dev->err_interrupt = irq_of_parse_and_map(pdev->dev.of_node, 0);
+	} else {
+		r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+
+		dev->regs = ioremap(r->start, resource_size(r));
+		if (!dev->regs) {
+			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No SMI register address given\n");
+			ret = -ENODEV;
+			goto out_free;
+		}
+
+		dev->err_interrupt = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+	}
Why do you have these different paths for OF and platform? AFAIK these
days when a OF device is automatically converted into a platform
device all the struct resources are created too, so you can't you just
use platform_get_resource and devm_request_and_ioremap for both flows?

Ditto for the interrupt - platform_get_irq should work in both cases?

Jason
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help