Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 3 authors, 2013-01-30

Re: kmemleak complaints in ip6mr.c

From: Tom Parkin <hidden>
Date: 2013-01-30 09:49:36

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 01:59:06PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
From: Tom Parkin <redacted>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 18:51:27 +0000
quoted
I've discovered what may be a memory leak in ip6mr when using network
namespaces.  Here's the kmemleak backtrace:


unreferenced object 0xf0d4a180 (size 96):
  comm "ip", pid 6735, jiffies 4294949643 (age 73.268s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    68 a1 d4 f0 00 02 20 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  h..... .........
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff 7f 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<c159b50c>] kmemleak_alloc+0x2c/0x60
    [<c1139c23>] __kmalloc+0x1c3/0x240
    [<c14e2627>] fib_default_rule_add+0x27/0x70
    [<c157f8df>] ip6mr_net_init+0x6f/0x140
    [<c14c4129>] ops_init+0x39/0x110
    [<c14c425f>] setup_net+0x5f/0xf0
    [<c14c46e4>] copy_net_ns+0x74/0xf0
    [<c105fc81>] create_new_namespaces+0xd1/0x160
    [<c105fedf>] unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0x5f/0xa0
    [<c1038a94>] sys_unshare+0x114/0x280
    [<c15b7ecd>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x28
    [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
How is this memory unreferenced?  fib_rule_default_add() adds
the allocated object to the ops->rules_list as it's very last
action.
I think it should be freed by ip6mr_rules_exit() when the namespace is
destroyed.  That function calls fib_rules_unregister() on the stashed
ops pointer in net->ipv6.mr6_rules_ops.
-- 
Tom Parkin
Katalix Systems Ltd
http://www.katalix.com
Catalysts for your Embedded Linux software development

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help