Re: [PATCH] Add support for netconsole driver used on bridge device with VIF attached
From: Ian Campbell <hidden>
Date: 2013-01-22 09:23:35
Also in:
xen-devel
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 18:00 +0000, yuval.shaia@oracle.com wrote:
On 01/21/2013 07:28 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:quoted
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 17:17 +0000, Yuval Shaia wrote:quoted
When starting a VM which has virtual interface attached to the same bridge (i.e vif = [type=netfront,bridge=xenbr0'] in vm.cfg) which is used for netconsole the following message appears (after about 60 seconds) and VM creation operation fails. Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not working.I'm not sure how this can relate netconsole since this happens before the guest even runs, doesn't it?Running the same scenario without netconsole runs smoothly.
But why? I can't make sense of your scenario and therefore cannot explain why this patch would make any difference. Perhaps your patch is just papering over some other issue?
quoted
quoted
As i see it, netconsole driver requires ndo_poll_controller from the device's controlling driver (function __netpoll_setup in net/core/netpoll.c), a thing that is not supported currently in xen_netback driver which is the driver that runs on dom0 and serve VM's virtual interface.Which domain is using netconsole? Is it dom0 or domU? What parameters do you give it?dom0. parameters: netconsole=1111@src-ip/xenbr0,2002@dst-ip/dst-mac
You give these parameters to dom0 so that dom0's own logs are sent to some other host? Are dst-ip and dst-mac a domain on the same host or are they some offbox logging service? I can see why the *bridge* device might need an ndo_poll_controller hook in this setup but I can't see any reason why the netback device would need one.
quoted
I assume it is the domU but if that's the case I don't see why a netback rather than netfront patch would be required. Or is dom0 doing netconsole where the log receiver is a domU?Log received at dom0 as output of xm cr vm.cfg command. netconsole is used on dom0 to monitor its log
Are you now saying that logging goes from domU to dom0? Which is it? In this scenario there is really no reason I can see that netback would need an ndo_poll_controller hook -- that would be needed in the domU in the netfront driver. Please can you explain the exact code path which results in this new hook being called. BTW looking at the patch as it is any use of this hook should be wrapped in CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER. Ian.