Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] net: Add support for hardware-offloaded encapsulation
From: Joseph Gasparakis <hidden>
Date: 2012-12-07 20:09:42
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, David Miller wrote:
From: Joseph Gasparakis <redacted> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 11:52:43 -0800 (PST)quoted
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, David Miller wrote:quoted
From: Joseph Gasparakis <redacted> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 11:41:46 -0800 (PST)quoted
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, David Miller wrote:quoted
From: Joseph Gasparakis <redacted> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 10:24:17 -0800 (PST)quoted
So the idea here is that the driver will use the headers for checksumming if the skb->encapsulation bit is on. The bit should be set in the protocol driver. To answer the second comment, the flags that we use in this series of patches is NETIF_F_IP_CSUM, NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM and NETIF_F_SG. These are the bits that we propose will be used for checksumming of encapsulation. As per a previous comment in v2, the hw_enc_features field should be used also in the future when NICs have more encap offloads, so one could indicate these features there from the driver. Furthermore, I submitted a patch for Rx checksumming, where NETIF_F_RXCSUM is used, again in conjunction with skb->encapsulation flag. As I mention in my logs, the driver is expected to set the ip_summed to UNNECESSARY and turn the skb->encapsulation on, to indicate that the inner headers are already HW checksummed.This is the kind of language that belongs in the commit message and code comments.Sure. I'll wait to gather some more feedback if there is any and I will re-spin this off adding more code comments and clarify this in the logs.Great. Please note that this request applies to your receive side change too.I believe the logs are sufficient in the rx patch: This patch adds capability in vxlan to identify received checksummed inner packets and signal them to the upper layers of the stack. The driver needs to set the skb->encapsulation bit and also set the skb->ip_summed to CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY. ...but I can add more comments to the code if this is what you are referring to.Yes, please do.
I will! Thanks.