Re: [PATCH] bridge: Bug fix for incorrect interpretation of MLDv2 maximum response code

On 14/12/2012 08:23, Stephen Hemminger wrote:

On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:19:04 +0800
Ang Way Chuang [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 14/12/2012 08:12, Stephen Hemminger wrote:

quoted

On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:07:01 +0800
Ang Way Chuang [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

This patch fixes the incorrect interpretation of endianness of MLDv2 maximum response
code within bridge's multicast snooping code.

Signed-off-by: Ang Way Chuang <redacted>
---

diff --git a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
index 977c3ee..29c6283 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c

@@ -1172,7 +1172,7 @@ static int br_ip6_multicast_query(struct net_bridge *br,
 		mld2q = (struct mld2_query *)icmp6_hdr(skb);
 		if (!mld2q->mld2q_nsrcs)
 			group = &mld2q->mld2q_mca;
-		max_delay = mld2q->mld2q_mrc ? MLDV2_MRC(mld2q->mld2q_mrc) : 1;
+		max_delay = mld2q->mld2q_mrc ? MLDV2_MRC(ntohs(mld2q->mld2q_mrc)) : 1;
 	}
 
 	if (!group)

Already fixed as part of my patch to fix sparse warnings.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

aye, aye.

Yours looks cleaner (I added a temp variable). You might want to submit
patch to switch to your oneline version.

Well, the patch did get into the netdev mailing list. I think your direct reply arrived in my mailbox first before I received my own patch through netdev. By the way, I don't see your patch on net-next git. Otherwise, I wouldn't have gone through the trouble of debugging and testing it on my computer. Is there any other repo that I should watch out to avoid this kind of silly situation in the future?