Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 5 authors, 2012-12-04

Re[2]: [PATCH] vxlan: Fix error that was resulting in VXLAN MTU size being 10 bytes too large

flat view

From: Naoto MATSUMOTO <hidden>
Date: 2012-12-04 01:03:16

Hi all

Sharing my testlab resut for you ;-)

A First Look At VXLAN over Infiniband Network On Linux 3.7-rc7
http://slidesha.re/TsCKWc

plz enjyoi it.

--
Naoto

On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 02:26:18 +1100
Joseph Glanville [off-list ref] wrote:
On 20 November 2012 03:03, Stephen Hemminger [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 22:33:50 +1100
Joseph Glanville [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 14 November 2012 08:33, Stephen Hemminger [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:37:19 -0500 (EST)
David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
From: Alexander Duyck <redacted>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 15:35:24 -0800
quoted
This change fixes an issue I found where VXLAN frames were fragmented when
they were up to the VXLAN MTU size.  I root caused the issue to the fact that
the headroom was 4 + 20 + 8 + 8.  This math doesn't appear to be correct
because we are not inserting a VLAN header, but instead a 2nd Ethernet header.
As such the math for the overhead should be 20 + 8 + 8 + 14 to account for the
extra headers that are inserted for VXLAN.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <redacted>
Applied, thanks for the detailed commit message.
Probably need smarter code there to look at header length requirement
of underlying device as well, maybe someone will be perverse and runn
vxlan over a tunnel or IPoIB.
Forgive my ignorance but why would running VXLAN on IPoIB require
special header handling? (and would it work or behave strangely?)

I was planning on giving this a go when 3.7 is released but I might do
that sooner if problems are anticipated.
quoted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Joseph.
Some lower layers require bigger (or smaller headers). As it was, vxlan
was only allocating skb with a fixed amount of headroom. This would lead to
lower layers having to copy the skb.

My suggestion has already been addressed by a later patch.
Hi,

I have tested VXLAN on IPoIB and it works perfectly. :)

Joseph.


-- 
CTO | Orion Virtualisation Solutions | www.orionvm.com.au
Phone: 1300 56 99 52 | Mobile: 0428 754 846
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-- 
SAKURA Internet Inc. / Senior Researcher
Naoto MATSUMOTO [off-list ref]
SAKURA Research Center <http://research.sakura.ad.jp/>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help