Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 3 authors, 2012-11-02

Re: [PATCH 4/9] net: openvswitch: use this_cpu_ptr per-cpu helper

flat view

From: Shan Wei <hidden>
Date: 2012-11-01 10:07:18
Also in: lkml

Christoph Lameter said, at 2012/11/1 1:39:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Shan Wei wrote:
quoted
--- a/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ void ovs_dp_process_received_packet(struct vport *p, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	int error;
 	int key_len;

-	stats = per_cpu_ptr(dp->stats_percpu, smp_processor_id());
+	stats = this_cpu_ptr(dp->stats_percpu);
Well this is an improvement and may be ok if the preemption is disabled at
this point. There is another possibility here to use this_cpu_read/add/inc
instead of determining the pointer to the local cpu first and then
performing operations on the fields. The pointer relocation with
this_cpu_xxx ops is implicit in the instructions and safe against changing
of processors. It would also save us the determination of a pointer to the
current cpus stats structure.
yes, this_cpu_ptr just locate the point to current cpu per-cpu data domain.
and then operating [read/write/inc/sub] fields of this per-cpu variable
maybe on other cpu because task is rescheduled for preemption, interrupt.

But for different field in same per-cpu variable, how to guarantee n_missed
and n_hit are from same cpu? 
this_cpu_read(dp->stats_percpu->n_missed);
[processor changed]
this_cpu_read(dp->stats_percpu->n_hit);


In addition, following usage of per_cpu_ptr can be replaced by this_cpu_read.

cpu=get_cpu()
....
*per_cpu_ptr(p,cpu)
....
....
put_cpu()
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help