Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 2 authors, 2012-11-29

Re: Fwd: Re: [PATCH] net: ipv6: change %8s to %s for rt->dst.dev->name in seq_printf of rt6_info_route

From: Chen Gang <hidden>
Date: 2012-11-27 04:44:30

于 2012年11月27日 12:18, Chen Gang 写道:
于 2012年11月27日 11:17, Shan Wei 写道:
quoted
quoted
Chen Gang said, at 2012/11/23 11:35:
quoted
quoted
2) about %*s:
 since kernel is an open system, IFNAMSIZ is belong to OS API level for outside
   it has effect both on individual kernel modules and user mode system call
   we need obey this rule, and %8s is not match this rule.
   so %8s is not suitable. (and now we have to choose %16s or %s).
Your patch will change the format of /proc/net/ipv6_route.
  Yes, it will be changed.
  although it belongs to "User Experience", it is not belong to os api level.
    for os api level: we must commit them not be changed (they are testament)
    for User Experience: we can change it, but maybe users feel 'not good'.
  I think (only for my thought, maybe not correct):
    for user input through /proc/* are all for os api level, not for "User Experience".
    for most of outputs to user through /proc/*, are "User Experience".
quoted
quoted
Why we need to keep be consistent with user mode?
  it is for "keep source code simple and clear"
  when others see the %8s, easy to make them miss understanding (not quite clear)
  so better to change it to %s.

quoted
quoted
However user operates device name, no effect on the showing of /proc/net/ipv6_route.
  now, no effect.


all together:
  since we are not user interactive program,
    "keeping source code simple and clear" is more important than "User Experience"

quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
 for the format of information which seq_printf output:
   it is not belong to OS API level for outside (at least, for current case, it is true). 
   so we need not keep 'compatible' of it, so %16s is not necessary.
Can you explain If we don't change to %s, what will happen?
  for outside, nothing will happen.

  so it is not for correctness, it is only for "keep source code simple and clear".
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
 for keeping source code simple and clearly:
   %s is better than %16s.

 so for result, we should choose %s only (neither %16s nor %8s).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-- Chen Gang Asianux Corporation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send
the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Chen Gang

Asianux Corporation
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help