[PATCH V2 00/14] Always build GSO/GRO functionality into the kernel · Vlad Yasevich <hidden> · 2012-11-15
[PATCH V2 01/14] net: Add generic packet offload infrastructure. · Vlad Yasevich <hidden> · 2012-11-15
[PATCH V2 02/14] net: Switch to using the new packet offload infrustructure · Vlad Yasevich <hidden> · 2012-11-15
[PATCH V2 03/14] net: Add net protocol offload registration infrustructure · Vlad Yasevich <hidden> · 2012-11-15
[PATCH V2 04/14] ipv6: Add new offload registration infrastructure. · Vlad Yasevich <hidden> · 2012-11-15
[PATCH V2 05/14] ipv4: Switch to using the new offload infrastructure. · Vlad Yasevich <hidden> · 2012-11-15
[PATCH V2 06/14] ipv6: Switch to using new offload infrastructure. · Vlad Yasevich <hidden> · 2012-11-15
[PATCH V2 07/14] ipv6: Separate ipv6 offload support · Vlad Yasevich <hidden> · 2012-11-15
[PATCH V2 09/14] ipv6: Separate out UDP offload functionality · Vlad Yasevich <hidden> · 2012-11-15
[PATCH V2 08/14] ipv6: Separate tcp offload functionality · Vlad Yasevich <hidden> · 2012-11-15
[PATCH V2 10/14] ipv6: Move exthdr offload support into separate file · Vlad Yasevich <hidden> · 2012-11-15
[PATCH V2 11/14] ipv6: Update ipv6 static library with newly needed functions · Vlad Yasevich <hidden> · 2012-11-15
[PATCH V2 12/14] ipv4: Pull GSO registration out of inet_init() · Vlad Yasevich <hidden> · 2012-11-15
[PATCH V2 13/14] ipv6: Pull IPv6 GSO registration out of the module · Vlad Yasevich <hidden> · 2012-11-15
[PATCH V2 14/14] net: Remove code duplication between offload structures · Vlad Yasevich <hidden> · 2012-11-15
Re: [PATCH V2 00/14] Always build GSO/GRO functionality into the kernel · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2012-11-15
Re: [PATCH V2 00/14] Always build GSO/GRO functionality into the kernel · Vlad Yasevich <hidden> · 2012-11-15
Re: [PATCH V2 00/14] Always build GSO/GRO functionality into the kernel · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2012-11-15

Re: [PATCH V2 00/14] Always build GSO/GRO functionality into the kernel

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2012-11-15 22:53:29

From: Vlad Yasevich <redacted>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:48:33 -0500

sorry, the patches were bases on net-2.6.  That's probably why you saw
the conflicts.  I wasn't sure where they should go since they actually
fix a long standing issue, so I bases them net-2.6.

I think even if we wanted to eventually submit this to the stable
tree(s), we should let it cook in net-next for a while because
it's on the invasive side.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help