Re: [PATCH] pppoatm: don't send frames to destroyed vcc
flat view
From: Krzysztof Mazur <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-08 06:23:49
Also in:
lkml
Subsystem:
atm, networking [general], ppp over atm (rfc 2364), the rest · Maintainers:
Chas Williams, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Mitchell Blank Jr, Linus Torvalds
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 05:38:04PM +0200, Krzysztof Mazur wrote:
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 02:32:50PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:quoted
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 14:19 +0200, Krzysztof Mazur wrote:quoted
Now pppoatm_send(), like vcc_sendmsg(), checks for vcc flags that indicate that vcc is not ready.And what locking prevents the flag from being set immediately after we check it?nothing, this patch should fix this. vcc = ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc; + bh_lock_sock(sk_atm(vcc));
After bh_lock_sock() sock_owned_by_user(sk_atm(vcc)) should be checked here. I'm sending fixed patch.
if (test_bit(ATM_VF_RELEASED, &vcc->flags) || test_bit(ATM_VF_CLOSE, &vcc->flags)
Krzysiek --
From 3ae93335423ed0ba526dc80163ff6dfeba9bbea1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krzysztof Mazur <redacted> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 08:10:22 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] pppoatm: fix race condition with destroying of vcc The pppoatm_send() calls vcc->send() and now also checks for some vcc flags that indicate destroyed vcc without proper locking. The vcc_sendmsg() uses lock_sock(sk). This lock is used by vcc_release(), so vcc_destroy_socket() will not be called between check and during ->send(). The vcc_release_async() sets ATM_VF_CLOSE, but it should be safe to call ->send() after it, because vcc->dev->ops->close() is not called. The pppoatm_send() is called with BH disabled, so bh_lock_sock() should be used instead of lock_sock(). Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Mazur <redacted> --- net/atm/pppoatm.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/atm/pppoatm.c b/net/atm/pppoatm.c
index 0dcb5dc..e3b2d69 100644
--- a/net/atm/pppoatm.c
+++ b/net/atm/pppoatm.c@@ -270,6 +270,7 @@ static int pppoatm_send(struct ppp_channel *chan, struct sk_buff *skb) { struct pppoatm_vcc *pvcc = chan_to_pvcc(chan); struct atm_vcc *vcc; + int ret; ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc = pvcc->atmvcc; pr_debug("(skb=0x%p, vcc=0x%p)\n", skb, pvcc->atmvcc);
@@ -304,17 +305,24 @@ static int pppoatm_send(struct ppp_channel *chan, struct sk_buff *skb) } vcc = ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc; + bh_lock_sock(sk_atm(vcc)); + if (sock_owned_by_user(sk_atm(vcc))) + goto nospace_unlock_sock; if (test_bit(ATM_VF_RELEASED, &vcc->flags) || test_bit(ATM_VF_CLOSE, &vcc->flags) || !test_bit(ATM_VF_READY, &vcc->flags)) - goto nospace; + goto nospace_unlock_sock; atomic_add(skb->truesize, &sk_atm(ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc)->sk_wmem_alloc); ATM_SKB(skb)->atm_options = ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc->atm_options; pr_debug("atm_skb(%p)->vcc(%p)->dev(%p)\n", skb, ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc, ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc->dev); - return ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc->send(ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc, skb) + ret = ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc->send(ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc, skb) ? DROP_PACKET : 1; + bh_unlock_sock(sk_atm(vcc)); + return ret; +nospace_unlock_sock: + bh_unlock_sock(sk_atm(vcc)); nospace: /* * We don't have space to send this SKB now, but we might have
--
1.7.12.2.2.g1c3c581