On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 12:33 -0400, Ramesh Nagappa wrote:
Hi Eric,
Yes, that is a good optimization. neigh_resolve_output() also has the
__skb_pull() outside the loop, is that required ? The changes would be
like ...
neigh_resolve_output()
...
- __skb_pull(skb, skb_network_offset(skb));
if (!neigh_event_send(neigh, skb)) {
int err;
struct net_device *dev = neigh->dev;
unsigned int seq;
if (dev->header_ops->cache && !neigh->hh.hh_len)
neigh_hh_init(neigh, dst);
do {
+ __skb_pull(skb, skb_network_offset(skb));
seq = read_seqbegin(&neigh->ha_lock);
err = dev_hard_header(skb, dev, ntohs(skb->protocol),
neigh->ha, NULL, skb->len);
} while (read_seqretry(&neigh->ha_lock, seq));
All similar constructions should be audited.
For example in net/decnet/dn_neigh.c , dn_neigh_output_packet()