On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 16:50 +0200, Maxime Bizon wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 15:02 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 14:51 +0200, Maxime Bizon wrote:
quoted
quoted
New convention would be : pass number of needed bytes after current
tail, not after current end.
Fully agree on this
Here is the proposal :
Looks fine
What is your plan for the actual pskb_expand_head() code now that you
will have absolute values for headroom & tailroom ?
They stay relative values.
For example, netlink_trim() really wants to shrink the skb head.
Because there will still be callers that have no clue of required
tailroom (nor further headroom requirement), like skb_cow() in
vlan_reorder_header().
What I plan is to not shrink size, unless specifically asked.
Its 3.8 material anyway, so a stable fix is needed on skb_recycle() and
NET_SKB_PAD minimal value.