Re: Information about napi_struct and net_device
flat view
From: Javier Domingo <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-29 17:41:06
I finally found the problem, and I think also the answer. I am modifying netif_receive_skb(), putting there my own queue. So the only problem I face now is how may I disable the main netpoll through. Looking at dev.c file, and knowing that there must be some way the solution I was looking for, I discovered enqueue_to_backlog function, that does what I want to do, from a packet, after processing it, be able to take the napi_struct that was responsible from it. I if you could tell me if using the method to obtain the napi_struct from the net_device pointer used in enqueue_to_backlog is ok, it would be great, Any way I will continue doing experiments and reading, Thanks a lot for your help and attention, and for whoever did [1] Javier Domingo [1]: http://www.linuxfoundation.org/images/1/1c/Network_data_flow_through_kernel.png 2012/10/29 Ben Hutchings [off-list ref]:
On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 18:18 +0200, Javier Domingo wrote:quoted
Hello, I am updating a kernel patch from 2.6.23-rc7 to v3.6, using git facilities, and I have found that there have been lots of changes in networking. Now the drivers are all by vendor, and more important, net_device is not used always, as napi_struct took its place. I have asked in #kernel but no one answered me, so I subscribed here. Is there any place I can read about how is it now designed the use of napi_struct and net_device? I have found a presentation[1] about how networking was changing etc, and I wondered if there is anything more precise about how it is actually implemented. I understand a little why napi_struct, but don't really know much about the change, Hope someone can help me,The initial change to napi_struct is explained in <http://lwn.net/Articles/244640/>. Since then there have been further changes: - netif_napi_del() has been added. You must call it to clean up NAPI contexts before freeing the associated net device(s). - Instead of netif_rx_schedule(), netif_rx_complete(), etc. you must use napi_schedule(), napi_complete() etc. which just take a napi_struct pointer. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.