Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 3 authors, 2012-10-23

Re: [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Introduce the SO_BINDTOIFINDEX

flat view

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2012-10-23 17:36:05

This is really a huge ball of confusion.

The user asks for a device to bind to, and they want the device which
had a particular name at the time of the call.

If you allow setting this via ifindex, the issues and races are the
same whether the name-->ifindex translation is done before the
sockopt() call or during it.

Furthermore both the name and the ifindex can change (that latter
via module unload/load).

If you want me to consider these changes seriously, talk less about
obtuse issues like symmetry and more about what problems it actually
solves.  As far as I can tell, all the same real issues still exist
even if we had this new interface.

In fact, I wouldn't mind if a getsockopt() on SO_BINDTODEVICE returned
BOTH the name and the ifindex in a special structure.  Then you could
actually construct a more foolproof mechanism on the user side to try
various ways to get the same device bound to during restart.

Symmetry is over-rated.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help