Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] tcp: introduce tcp_tw_interval to specifiy the time of TIME-WAIT
From: Cong Wang <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-08 03:18:49
From: Cong Wang <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-08 03:18:49
On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 08:09 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
No, its not very friendly, but the people using this are violating the RFC, which isn't very friendly. :)
Could you be more specific? In RFC 793, AFAIK, it is allowed to be changed: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc793 " To be sure that a TCP does not create a segment that carries a sequence number which may be duplicated by an old segment remaining in the network, the TCP must keep quiet for a maximum segment lifetime (MSL) before assigning any sequence numbers upon starting up or recovering from a crash in which memory of sequence numbers in use was lost. For this specification the MSL is taken to be 2 minutes. This is an engineering choice, and may be changed if experience indicates it is desirable to do so." or I must still be missing something here... :)