Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 4 authors, 2012-10-09

Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] tcp: introduce tcp_tw_interval to specifiy the time of TIME-WAIT

From: Cong Wang <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-08 03:18:49

On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 08:09 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
No, its not very friendly, but the people using this are violating the RFC,
which isn't very friendly. :)
Could you be more specific? In RFC 793, AFAIK, it is allowed to be
changed:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc793

" To be sure that a TCP does not create a segment that carries a
  sequence number which may be duplicated by an old segment remaining in
  the network, the TCP must keep quiet for a maximum segment lifetime
  (MSL) before assigning any sequence numbers upon starting up or
  recovering from a crash in which memory of sequence numbers in use was
  lost.  For this specification the MSL is taken to be 2 minutes.  This
  is an engineering choice, and may be changed if experience indicates
  it is desirable to do so."

or I must still be missing something here... :)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help