Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 2 authors, 2012-10-07

Re: [PATCH] Packet mmap : allow the user to choose the offset of the tx payload.

flat view

From: Daniel Borkmann <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-05 19:38:07

On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:21 PM, pchavent [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, 5 Oct 2012 16:17:12 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Paul Chavent [off-list ref]
wrote:
quoted
The tx offset of packet mmap tx ring used to be :
(TPACKET2_HDRLEN - sizeof(struct sockaddr_ll))

The problem is that depending on the usage of SOCK_DGRAM or
SOCK_RAW, the payload could be aligned or not.

This patch allow to let the user give an offset for it's tx
payload if he desires.

Signed-off-by: Paul Chavent <redacted>
Can you provide an example when it doesn't hit TPACKET_ALIGNMENT?
When we use tx ring, the user have to write at (TPACKET_HDRLEN -
sizeof(struct sockaddr_ll))

This adress is aligned on TPACKET_ALIGNMENT since
TPACKET_HDRLEN = (TPACKET_ALIGN(sizeof(struct tpacket_hdr)) + sizeof(struct
sockaddr_ll))

When we use the tx ring with SOCK_RAW option, the mac header is aligned on
TPACKET_ALIGNMENT, but not the payload (14 bytes away).
Okay, I'm confused about your intentions, maybe I'm missing something.
The man-page of packet(7) clearly says:

The socket_type is either SOCK_RAW for raw packets *including* the
link level header or SOCK_DGRAM for cooked packets with  the link
level header *removed*.

So this is perfectly intended behavior of PF_PACKET.

Cheers,

Daniel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help