On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 04:41:21PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
use proper netlink_dump_control.done and .module to avoid panic.
Signed-off-by: Gao feng <redacted>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | 8 ++++++++
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
index 9807f32..509a257 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
@@ -706,6 +706,7 @@ static int ctnetlink_done(struct netlink_callback *cb)
nf_ct_put((struct nf_conn *)cb->args[1]);
if (cb->data)
kfree(cb->data);
+ netlink_dump_done(cb);
I think you can call netlink_dump_done from af_netlink.c:
static int netlink_dump(struct sock *sk)
...
if (cb->done) {
cb->done(cb);
netlink_dump_done(...);
}
Thus, you don't need to change netlink_dump_control in every netlink
subsystem.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
return 0;
}
@@ -1022,6 +1023,7 @@ ctnetlink_get_conntrack(struct sock *ctnl, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct netlink_dump_control c = {
.dump = ctnetlink_dump_table,
.done = ctnetlink_done,
+ .module = THIS_MODULE,
You can do something similar to:
9f00d97 netlink: hide struct module parameter in netlink_kernel_create
by definiting netlink_dump_start as static inline and using
THIS_MODULE from there.
If I'm not missing anything, with those two changes, you will not need
to modify any caller and it will result one single patch.