Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 2 authors, 2012-09-12

Re: [V3 PATCH 9/9] cxgb4vf: Chelsio FCoE offload driver submission (header compatibility fixes).

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2012-09-12 05:47:46
Also in: linux-scsi

From: Naresh Kumar Inna <redacted>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:05:22 +0530
On 9/11/2012 11:03 PM, David Miller wrote:
quoted
From: Naresh Kumar Inna <redacted>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:09:07 +0530
quoted
This patch contains minor fixes to make cxgb4vf driver work with the updates to
shared firmware/hardware header files.

Signed-off-by: Naresh Kumar Inna <redacted>
You cannot submit a patch set that isn't bisectable, and in particular
create a situation that mid-way through your patch set things do not
build or operate correctly.
Sorry, I am new to this process. The reason I did that was because I was
not sure if I could create a single patch with both cxgb4 and cxgb4vf
files in it, since they are two different subsystems. If I could do
that, the single patch then would build on its own, and not be dependent
on the other patches in the series. Is that something I can do?
I don't know how else to say this, every step along the way the tree
has to build.  You arrange the patches however necessary to achieve
that goal.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help