Thread (7 messages) flat view 7 messages, 3 authors, 2012-09-21

Re: HTB vs CoDel performance

From: Lin Ming <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-19 01:27:36

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 17:56 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
quoted
I need traffic priority/traffic shaping/rate control ... actually all
QoS features on the router.
And if I just set the rate to gigabit(no other settings), for example,

# tc qdisc add dev eth10 root handle 20: htb default 1
# tc class add dev eth10 parent 20 classid 20:1 htb prio 2 rate
1024Mbit ceil 1024Mbit burst 1281408b cburst 1281408b

it should gain similar performance as pfifo_fast.

codel has no rate control. So seems I have to find way to optimize htb?
Are you really cpu limited ? You might hit some clocks artifacts.
Did you mean the cpu speed? It's an ARMv5 processor.
BogoMIPS	: 1196.03
rate limiting to 1Gbps probably need high resolution timers.
High resolution timer is enabled.
HTB is not the only way to rate limit.
I'll try other classful qdiscs.

Thanks.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help