Re: [RFC PATCH v2] ipv6: fix handling of blackhole and prohibit routes
From: Nicolas Dichtel <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-05 10:03:41
Please, forget this patch, it's a wrong version. Sorry for that. Regards, Nicolas Le 05/09/2012 13:34, Nicolas Dichtel a écrit :
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
When adding a blackhole or a prohibit route, they were handling like classic routes. Moreover, it was only possible to add this kind of routes by specifying an interface. Bug already reported here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=498498 Before the patch: $ ip route add blackhole 2001::1/128 RTNETLINK answers: No such device $ ip route add blackhole 2001::1/128 dev eth0 $ ip -6 route | grep 2001 2001::1 dev eth0 metric 1024 After: $ ip route add blackhole 2001::1/128 $ ip -6 route | grep 2001 blackhole 2001::1 dev lo metric 1024 error -22 Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <redacted> --- include/net/ip6_fib.h | 1 + net/ipv6/route.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/include/net/ip6_fib.h b/include/net/ip6_fib.h index 0fedbd8..cd64cf3 100644 --- a/include/net/ip6_fib.h +++ b/include/net/ip6_fib.h@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct fib6_config { int fc_ifindex; u32 fc_flags; u32 fc_protocol; + u32 fc_type; /* only 8 bits are used */ struct in6_addr fc_dst; struct in6_addr fc_src;diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c index 8e80fd2..5642fb5 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/route.c +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c@@ -1463,8 +1463,18 @@ int ip6_route_add(struct fib6_config *cfg) } rt->dst.output = ip6_pkt_discard_out; rt->dst.input = ip6_pkt_discard; - rt->dst.error = -ENETUNREACH; rt->rt6i_flags = RTF_REJECT|RTF_NONEXTHOP; + switch (cfg->fc_type) { + case RTM_BLACKHOLE: + rt->dst.error = -EINVAL; + break; + case RTM_PROHIBIT: + rt->dst.error = -EACCES; + break; + default: + rt->dst.error = -ENETUNREACH; + break; + } goto install_route; }@@ -2261,8 +2271,11 @@ static int rtm_to_fib6_config(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, cfg->fc_src_len = rtm->rtm_src_len; cfg->fc_flags = RTF_UP; cfg->fc_protocol = rtm->rtm_protocol; + cfg->type = rtm->rtm_type; - if (rtm->rtm_type == RTN_UNREACHABLE) + if (rtm->rtm_type == RTN_UNREACHABLE || + rtm->rtm_type == RTN_BLACKHOLE || + rtm->rtm_type == RTN_PROHIBIT) cfg->fc_flags |= RTF_REJECT; if (rtm->rtm_type == RTN_LOCAL)@@ -2391,8 +2404,19 @@ static int rt6_fill_node(struct net *net, rtm->rtm_table = table; if (nla_put_u32(skb, RTA_TABLE, table)) goto nla_put_failure; - if (rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_REJECT) - rtm->rtm_type = RTN_UNREACHABLE; + if (rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_REJECT) { + switch (rt->dst.error) { + case -EINVAL: + rtm->rtm_type = RTN_BLACKHOLE; + break; + case -EACCES: + rtm->rtm_type = RTN_PROHIBIT; + break; + default: + rtm->rtm_type = RTN_UNREACHABLE; + break; + } + } else if (rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_LOCAL) rtm->rtm_type = RTN_LOCAL; else if (rt->dst.dev && (rt->dst.dev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK))
-- Nicolas DICHTEL 6WIND R&D Engineer Tel: +33 1 39 30 92 10 Fax: +33 1 39 30 92 11 nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com www.6wind.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/6windsoftware Join the Multicore Packet Processing Forum: www.multicorepacketprocessing.com Ce courriel ainsi que toutes les pièces jointes, est uniquement destiné à son ou ses destinataires. Il contient des informations confidentielles qui sont la propriété de 6WIND. Toute révélation, distribution ou copie des informations qu'il contient est strictement interdite. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, veuillez immédiatement le signaler à l'émetteur et détruire toutes les données reçues. This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contains information that is confidential and proprietary to 6WIND. All unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.