Re: IPv4 BUG: held lock freed!
From: Lin Ming <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-19 14:23:55
Also in:
lkml
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote: <snip...>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Hi Fengguang, thanks for this report. Hmm, this looks like sk_reset_timer() is called on a socket, and timer triggers _before_ the sock_hold() So the timer handler decrements sk_refcnt to 0 and calls sk_free() Its probably a bug introduced (or uncovered) by commit 6f458dfb40 (tcp: improve latencies of timer triggered events) I always found sk_reset_timer() a bit racy... void sk_reset_timer(struct sock *sk, struct timer_list* timer, unsigned long expires) { if (!mod_timer(timer, expires)) sock_hold(sk); // MIGHT BE TOO LATE } Following should be safer... void sk_reset_timer(struct sock *sk, struct timer_list* timer, unsigned long expires) { sock_hold(sk); if (mod_timer(timer, expires)) sock_put(sk); } Could you test following patch ? By the way, there is a typo in tcp_delack_timer() (should use TCP_DELACK_TIMER_DEFERRED instead of TCP_WRITE_TIMER_DEFERRED) Thanks !diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c index 7678237..6278a11 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c@@ -417,10 +417,12 @@ void tcp_v4_err(struct sk_buff *icmp_skb, u32 info) if (code == ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED) { /* PMTU discovery (RFC1191) */ tp->mtu_info = info; - if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk)) + if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk)) { tcp_v4_mtu_reduced(sk); - else - set_bit(TCP_MTU_REDUCED_DEFERRED, &tp->tsq_flags); + } else { + if (!test_and_set_bit(TCP_MTU_REDUCED_DEFERRED, &tp->tsq_flags)) + sock_hold(sk); + } goto out; }diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c index 20dfd89..d046326 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c@@ -910,14 +910,18 @@ void tcp_release_cb(struct sock *sk) if (flags & (1UL << TCP_TSQ_DEFERRED)) tcp_tsq_handler(sk); - if (flags & (1UL << TCP_WRITE_TIMER_DEFERRED)) + if (flags & (1UL << TCP_WRITE_TIMER_DEFERRED)) { tcp_write_timer_handler(sk); - - if (flags & (1UL << TCP_DELACK_TIMER_DEFERRED)) + __sock_put(sk); + } + if (flags & (1UL << TCP_DELACK_TIMER_DEFERRED)) { tcp_delack_timer_handler(sk); - - if (flags & (1UL << TCP_MTU_REDUCED_DEFERRED)) + __sock_put(sk); + } + if (flags & (1UL << TCP_MTU_REDUCED_DEFERRED)) { sk->sk_prot->mtu_reduced(sk); + __sock_put(sk); + } } EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_release_cb);diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c index 6df36ad..b774a03 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c@@ -252,7 +252,8 @@ static void tcp_delack_timer(unsigned long data) inet_csk(sk)->icsk_ack.blocked = 1; NET_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_DELAYEDACKLOCKED); /* deleguate our work to tcp_release_cb() */ - set_bit(TCP_WRITE_TIMER_DEFERRED, &tcp_sk(sk)->tsq_flags); + if (!test_and_set_bit(TCP_DELACK_TIMER_DEFERRED, &tcp_sk(sk)->tsq_flags)) + sock_hold(sk); } bh_unlock_sock(sk); sock_put(sk);@@ -481,7 +482,8 @@ static void tcp_write_timer(unsigned long data) tcp_write_timer_handler(sk);
Will it still has problem if code goes here without sock_hold(sk)?
} else {
/* deleguate our work to tcp_release_cb() */
- set_bit(TCP_WRITE_TIMER_DEFERRED, &tcp_sk(sk)->tsq_flags);
+ if (!test_and_set_bit(TCP_WRITE_TIMER_DEFERRED, &tcp_sk(sk)->tsq_flags))
+ sock_hold(sk);
}
bh_unlock_sock(sk);
sock_put(sk);