Thread (12 messages) flat view 12 messages, 5 authors, 2012-08-21

Re: IPv4 BUG: held lock freed!

From: Lin Ming <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-19 14:23:55
Also in: lkml

On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:
<snip...>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Hi Fengguang, thanks for this report.

Hmm, this looks like sk_reset_timer() is called on a socket, and timer
triggers _before_ the sock_hold()

So the timer handler decrements sk_refcnt to 0 and calls sk_free()

Its probably a bug introduced (or uncovered) by commit 6f458dfb40 (tcp:
improve latencies of timer triggered events)

I always found sk_reset_timer() a bit racy...

void sk_reset_timer(struct sock *sk, struct timer_list* timer,
                    unsigned long expires)
{
        if (!mod_timer(timer, expires))
                sock_hold(sk); // MIGHT BE TOO LATE
}

Following should be safer...

void sk_reset_timer(struct sock *sk, struct timer_list* timer,
                    unsigned long expires)
{
        sock_hold(sk);
        if (mod_timer(timer, expires))
                sock_put(sk);
}

Could you test following patch ?

By the way, there is a typo in tcp_delack_timer()
(should use TCP_DELACK_TIMER_DEFERRED instead of
TCP_WRITE_TIMER_DEFERRED)


Thanks !
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index 7678237..6278a11 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -417,10 +417,12 @@ void tcp_v4_err(struct sk_buff *icmp_skb, u32 info)

                if (code == ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED) { /* PMTU discovery (RFC1191) */
                        tp->mtu_info = info;
-                       if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk))
+                       if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
                                tcp_v4_mtu_reduced(sk);
-                       else
-                               set_bit(TCP_MTU_REDUCED_DEFERRED, &tp->tsq_flags);
+                       } else {
+                               if (!test_and_set_bit(TCP_MTU_REDUCED_DEFERRED, &tp->tsq_flags))
+                                       sock_hold(sk);
+                       }
                        goto out;
                }
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index 20dfd89..d046326 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -910,14 +910,18 @@ void tcp_release_cb(struct sock *sk)
        if (flags & (1UL << TCP_TSQ_DEFERRED))
                tcp_tsq_handler(sk);

-       if (flags & (1UL << TCP_WRITE_TIMER_DEFERRED))
+       if (flags & (1UL << TCP_WRITE_TIMER_DEFERRED)) {
                tcp_write_timer_handler(sk);
-
-       if (flags & (1UL << TCP_DELACK_TIMER_DEFERRED))
+               __sock_put(sk);
+       }
+       if (flags & (1UL << TCP_DELACK_TIMER_DEFERRED)) {
                tcp_delack_timer_handler(sk);
-
-       if (flags & (1UL << TCP_MTU_REDUCED_DEFERRED))
+               __sock_put(sk);
+       }
+       if (flags & (1UL << TCP_MTU_REDUCED_DEFERRED)) {
                sk->sk_prot->mtu_reduced(sk);
+               __sock_put(sk);
+       }
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_release_cb);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c
index 6df36ad..b774a03 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c
@@ -252,7 +252,8 @@ static void tcp_delack_timer(unsigned long data)
                inet_csk(sk)->icsk_ack.blocked = 1;
                NET_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_DELAYEDACKLOCKED);
                /* deleguate our work to tcp_release_cb() */
-               set_bit(TCP_WRITE_TIMER_DEFERRED, &tcp_sk(sk)->tsq_flags);
+               if (!test_and_set_bit(TCP_DELACK_TIMER_DEFERRED, &tcp_sk(sk)->tsq_flags))
+                       sock_hold(sk);
        }
        bh_unlock_sock(sk);
        sock_put(sk);
@@ -481,7 +482,8 @@ static void tcp_write_timer(unsigned long data)
                tcp_write_timer_handler(sk);
Will it still has problem if code goes here without sock_hold(sk)?
        } else {
                /* deleguate our work to tcp_release_cb() */
-               set_bit(TCP_WRITE_TIMER_DEFERRED, &tcp_sk(sk)->tsq_flags);
+               if (!test_and_set_bit(TCP_WRITE_TIMER_DEFERRED, &tcp_sk(sk)->tsq_flags))
+                       sock_hold(sk);
        }
        bh_unlock_sock(sk);
        sock_put(sk);
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help