On 30/08/2012 17:25, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Your patch was mangled by your email client, and its always safer to
test a patch...
Sorry about that, I am not used to sending patch (tried again, I hope it is fine this time ...).
I did try my patch in my setup, and did not notice any problem at the moment.
I sent this patch as a rfc, mainly because I want to know if my analysis is correct (and if not, understand why).
Dont trust the comment, its a bit misleading.
Comment intent was to say :
/* One reference from device. We must do this before
* we eventually invoke __ipv6_regen_rndid().
*/
Mmm, ok.
But if CONFIG_IPV6_PRIVACY is not selected, then I can't find where the associated in6_dev_put is done for this in6_dev_hold.
Besides, __ipv6_regen_rndid is a "CONFIG_IPV6_PRIVACY-only" stuff.
diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index 6bc85f7..263fcf3 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -393,11 +393,6 @@ static struct inet6_dev *ipv6_add_dev(struct net_device *dev)
return NULL;
}
- /* One reference from device. We must do this before
- * we invoke __ipv6_regen_rndid().
- */
- in6_dev_hold(ndev);
-
if (dev->flags & (IFF_NOARP | IFF_LOOPBACK))
ndev->cnf.accept_dad = -1;
@@ -410,6 +405,12 @@ static struct inet6_dev *ipv6_add_dev(struct net_device *dev)
#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_PRIVACY
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ndev->tempaddr_list);
+
+ /* One reference from device. We must do this before
+ * we invoke ipv6_regen_rndid().
+ */
+ in6_dev_hold(ndev);
+
setup_timer(&ndev->regen_timer, ipv6_regen_rndid, (unsigned long)ndev);
if ((dev->flags&IFF_LOOPBACK) ||
dev->type == ARPHRD_TUNNEL ||
--
David Marchand
This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider MailControl. - www.blackspider.com