Re: [PATCH 2/3] ipvs: Fix faulty IPv6 extension header handling in IPVS
flat view
From: Patrick McHardy <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-29 12:34:34
Also in:
lvs-devel, netfilter-devel
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
To Patrick, On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 11:47 +0200, Hans Schillstrom wrote:quoted
quoted
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 14:02 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:quoted
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Hans Schillstrom wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
How about we change netfilter to set up the skb's transport header at an early time so we can avoid all (most of) these header scans in netfilter?I think that would be great, maybe it should be global i.e. not only a netfilter issue.I think in most other cases the headers are supposed to be processed sequentially. One problem though - to be useful for netfilter/IPVS we'd also need to store the transport layer protocol somewhere.I guess that's the problem, adding it to the skb will not be popular .... Right now I don't have a good solution, maybe a more generic netfilter ptr in the skb ...I guess inet6_skb_parm will be at least slightly more popular than adding it to the skb itself. The netfilter pointers are all used for optional things, so we can't really add it to any of those.Okay, but how do we go from here? Hans, should this hold back the patch ("ipvs: Fix faulty IPv6 extension header handling in IPVS"). Or should we pursue our patch, and circle back later once e.g. Patrick have found a generic solution for IPv6 transport header handling?Should we give it a try to put it in inet6_skb_parm and minimize what we put there ? I think it could be worth it.Okay, but then I do need some help and guidance, especially from Patrick, think. First of all, where in the netfilter code, should we update the new fields in inet6_skb_parm?
Good question. I think we'd need at least three spots since every one of these subsystems can be used indepedently from each other: - conntrack/IPVS: PRE_ROUTING/LOCAL_OUT at lowest priority - ip6tables: first time packet hits ip6t_do_table()? Actually, looking at ipv6_rcv(), this might not work at all since it sets skb->transport_header to the first header following the IPv6 header. This is used when processing extension headers by IPv6.