[PATCH 1/2] ipv6: do not hold route table lock when send ndisc probe · Cong Wang <hidden> · 2012-08-17
[PATCH 2/2] ipv6: remove some useless RCU read lock · Cong Wang <hidden> · 2012-08-17
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ipv6: do not hold route table lock when send ndisc probe · Debabrata Banerjee <hidden> · 2012-08-17
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ipv6: do not hold route table lock when send ndisc probe · Cong Wang <hidden> · 2012-08-20
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ipv6: do not hold route table lock when send ndisc probe · Cong Wang <hidden> · 2012-08-21
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ipv6: do not hold route table lock when send ndisc probe · Banerjee, Debabrata <hidden> · 2012-08-22
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ipv6: do not hold route table lock when send ndisc probe · Cong Wang <hidden> · 2012-08-23
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ipv6: do not hold route table lock when send ndisc probe · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2012-08-23
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ipv6: do not hold route table lock when send ndisc probe · Cong Wang <hidden> · 2012-08-24
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ipv6: do not hold route table lock when send ndisc probe · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2012-08-24
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ipv6: do not hold route table lock when send ndisc probe · Cong Wang <hidden> · 2012-08-24

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ipv6: do not hold route table lock when send ndisc probe

From: Cong Wang <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-21 03:44:16

Hi, Debabrata,

Could you help to test the attached patch below?

Thanks!

Attachments

ipv6-deadlock.diff [text/x-patch] 1563 bytes · preview