On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 23:24 -0700, David Miller wrote:
I already applied your patch, as I told you here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=134517122805719&w=2
This means you are submitting a patch which doesn't not even apply
to the net-next tree.
Instead of continuing to dig yourself deeper and deeper, take a
break, take a deep breath, and work slowly and carefully.
--
BTW, we (incorrectly ?) mix RCU and RCU_BH in this file, and since we
use synchronize_rcu() anyway, we should/could use rcu_read_lock()
everywhere we can, as this is less expensive (currently inlined at least
on x86) than rcu_read_lock_bh()
I'll send a cleanup patch on a separate thread