On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 04:28 +0000, Jain Priyanka-B32167 wrote:
Hello Eric Dumazet,
Like Fan Du, even I could not see the bug in the current code. Can you please elaborate
Yes, it might be invalid, but all the callers have checked the return value, thus use it in a sane way.
So I don't follow "Note the current code is buggy as well".
Am I missing something here?
Hmm, I misread the code, sorry for the false alarm.