Re: [PATCH] net: force dst_default_metrics to const section
From: Ben Hutchings <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-07 22:12:45
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 22:55 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>quoted
Some day the compiler may be smart enough to ignore the different between explicit and implicit zero-initialisation, and put it back in BSS. Declaring this __cache_aligned_in_smp might be a better option.__cache_aligned_in_smp aligns start of the structure, but can be followed by another var in same cache line. Yes, this is bad.
Oh, that's unexpected.
By the way we dont care of cache alignment on this structure, only it should be const. Its a soft requirement, machine wont crash if it is not the case.
Right.
If compiler is smart one day as you say (it should first be non buggy IMHO), then we can add a non zero field like this :
[...] That would work, but it's ugly! How about defining and using a meaningfully-named macro that expands to __section(.rodata)? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.