Re: [PATCH v4] net: cgroup: fix access the unallocated memory in netprio cgroup
From: John Fastabend <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-18 14:10:22
Also in:
lkml
On 7/18/2012 5:21 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 01:47:25PM -0700, John Fastabend wrote:quoted
On 7/12/2012 12:50 AM, Gao feng wrote:quoted
there are some out of bound accesses in netprio cgroup. now before accessing the dev->priomap.priomap array,we only check if the dev->priomap exist.and because we don't want to see additional bound checkings in fast path, so we should make sure that dev->priomap is null or array size of dev->priomap.priomap is equal to max_prioidx + 1; so in write_priomap logic,we should call extend_netdev_table when dev->priomap is null and dev->priomap.priomap_len < max_len. and in cgrp_create->update_netdev_tables logic,we should call extend_netdev_table only when dev->priomap exist and dev->priomap.priomap_len < max_len. and it's not needed to call update_netdev_tables in write_priomap, we can only allocate the net device's priomap which we change through net_prio.ifpriomap. this patch also add a return value for update_netdev_tables & extend_netdev_table, so when new_priomap is allocated failed, write_priomap will stop to access the priomap,and return -ENOMEM back to the userspace to tell the user what happend. Change From v3: 1. add rtnl protect when reading max_prioidx in write_priomap. 2. only call extend_netdev_table when map->priomap_len < max_len, this will make sure array size of dev->map->priomap always bigger than any prioidx. 3. add a function write_update_netdev_table to make codes clear. Change From v2: 1. protect extend_netdev_table by RTNL. 2. when extend_netdev_table failed,call dev_put to reduce device's refcount. Signed-off-by: Gao feng <redacted> Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> --- net/core/netprio_cgroup.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)[...]quoted
+ +static int update_netdev_tables(void) +{ + int ret = 0; struct net_device *dev; - u32 max_len = atomic_read(&max_prioidx) + 1; + u32 max_len; struct netprio_map *map;need to check if net subsystem is initialized before we try to use it here... if (some_check) -> need to lookup what this check is return ret;quoted
rtnl_lock(); + max_len = atomic_read(&max_prioidx) + 1; for_each_netdev(&init_net, dev) { map = rtnl_dereference(dev->priomap); - if ((!map) || - (map->priomap_len < max_len)) - extend_netdev_table(dev, max_len); + /* + * don't allocate priomap if we didn't + * change net_prio.ifpriomap (map == NULL), + * this will speed up skb_update_prio. + */ + if (map && map->priomap_len < max_len) { + ret = extend_netdev_table(dev, max_len); + if (ret < 0) + break; + } } rtnl_unlock(); + return ret; } static struct cgroup_subsys_state *cgrp_create(struct cgroup *cgrp) { struct cgroup_netprio_state *cs; - int ret; + int ret = -EINVAL; cs = kzalloc(sizeof(*cs), GFP_KERNEL); if (!cs) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); - if (cgrp->parent && cgrp_netprio_state(cgrp->parent)->prioidx) { - kfree(cs); - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); - } + if (cgrp->parent && cgrp_netprio_state(cgrp->parent)->prioidx) + goto out; ret = get_prioidx(&cs->prioidx); - if (ret != 0) { + if (ret < 0) { pr_warn("No space in priority index array\n"); - kfree(cs); - return ERR_PTR(ret); + goto out; + } + + ret = update_netdev_tables(); + if (ret < 0) { + put_prioidx(cs->prioidx); + goto out; }Gao, This introduces a null ptr dereference when netprio_cgroup is built into the kernel because update_netdev_tables() depends on init_net. However cgrp_create is being called by cgroup_init before do_initcalls() is called and before net_dev_init(). .JohnNot sure I follow here John. Shouldn't init_net be initialized prior to any network devices getting registered? In other words, shouldn't for_each_netdev just result in zero iterations through the loop? Neil
init_net _is_ initialized prior to any network devices getting
registered but not before cgrp_create called via cgroup_init.
#define for_each_netdev(net, d) \
list_for_each_entry(d, &(net)->dev_base_head, dev_list)
but dev_base_head is zeroed at this time. In netdev_init we have,
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&net->dev_base_head);
but we haven't got that far yet because cgroup_init is called
before do_initcalls().