From: Or Gerlitz <redacted>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:22:42 +0300
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:41 PM, David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Please use CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL consistently to protect this feature
in your driver sources.
Using CPU_RMAP in a few places is inconsistent, and not what other
drivers do.
We're indeed using CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL across the place, and only in two
places which deal directly with rmap use CPU_RMAP. The latter is
selected by RFS_ACCEL, but if you feel this is inconsistent, will
change to use only one define.
That's basically what I said.