Re: [PATCH v2] sctp: Fix list corruption resulting from freeing an association on a list
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Date: 2012-07-17 12:25:42
Also in:
linux-sctp
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:32:50PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 15:13:51 -0400quoted
A few days ago Dave Jones reported this oops:...quoted
It appears from his analysis and some staring at the code that this is likely occuring because an association is getting freed while still on the sctp_assoc_hashtable. As a result, we get a gpf when traversing the hashtable while a freed node corrupts part of the list. Nominally I would think that an mibalanced refcount was responsible for this, but I can't seem to find any obvious imbalance. What I did note however was that the two places where we create an association using sctp_primitive_ASSOCIATE (__sctp_connect and sctp_sendmsg), have failure paths which free a newly created association after calling sctp_primitive_ASSOCIATE. sctp_primitive_ASSOCIATE brings us into the sctp_sf_do_prm_asoc path, which issues a SCTP_CMD_NEW_ASOC side effect, which in turn adds a new association to the aforementioned hash table. the sctp command interpreter that process side effects has not way to unwind previously processed commands, so freeing the association from the __sctp_connect or sctp_sendmsg error path would lead to a freed association remaining on this hash table. I've fixed this but modifying sctp_[un]hash_established to use hlist_del_init, which allows us to proerly use hlist_unhashed to check if the node is on a hashlist safely during a delete. That in turn alows us to safely call sctp_unhash_established in the __sctp_connect and sctp_sendmsg error paths before freeing them, regardles of what the associations state is on the hash list. I noted, while I was doing this, that the __sctp_unhash_endpoint was using hlist_unhsashed in a simmilar fashion, but never nullified any removed nodes pointers to make that function work properly, so I fixed that up in a simmilar fashion. I attempted to test this using a virtual guest running the SCTP_RR test from netperf in a loop while running the trinity fuzzer, both in a loop. I wasn't able to recreate the problem prior to this fix, nor was I able to trigger the failure after (neither of which I suppose is suprising). Given the trace above however, I think its likely that this is what we hit. Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Reported-by: davej@redhat.comLooks great, applied and queued up for -stable, thanks Neil.
Thanks Dave! Neil