From: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us> Date: 2012-07-10 00:09:03
skb->dev is being unnecessarily set during ring init. It is already being set
to the proper value when eth_type_trans is called on packet receive, and the
skb->dev is not referenced anywhere else in the code.
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/amd/lance.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
From: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us> Date: 2012-07-10 00:09:08
skb->dev is being unnecessarily set after calling eth_type_trans.
eth_type_trans already sets skb->dev to the proper value, thus making this
unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>
Cc: Christian Benvenuti <redacted>
Cc: Roopa Prabhu <redacted>
Cc: Neel Patel <redacted>
Cc: Nishank Trivedi <redacted>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
From: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us> Date: 2012-07-10 00:09:13
skb->dev is being unnecessarily set by the driver on packet recieve.
eth_type_trans already sets skb->dev to the proper value and it is not
referenced anywhere else in the dirver, thus making its setting unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>
Cc: Sony Chacko <redacted>
Cc: Rajesh Borundia <redacted>
---
.../net/ethernet/qlogic/netxen/netxen_nic_init.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
From: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us> Date: 2012-07-10 00:09:19
skb->dev is being unnecessarily set before calling eth_type_trans.
eth_type_trans already sets skb->dev to the proper value, thus making this
unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_etop.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
From: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us> Date: 2012-07-10 00:09:24
skb->dev is being unnecessarily set during ring init. It is already being set
to the proper value when eth_type_trans is called on packet receive, and the
skb->dev is not referenced anywhere else in the code.
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ksz884x.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
From: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us> Date: 2012-07-10 00:09:29
skb->dev is being unnecessarily set before calling eth_type_trans.
eth_type_trans already sets skb->dev to the proper value, thus making this
unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>
Cc: Anirban Chakraborty <redacted>
Cc: Sony Chacko <redacted>
Cc: linux-driver@qlogic.com
---
drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_init.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
From: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us> Date: 2012-07-10 00:09:34
skb->dev is being unnecessarily set by the driver on packet recieve.
eth_type_trans already sets skb->dev to the proper value and it is not
referenced anywhere else in the dirver, thus making its setting unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>
Cc: Anirban Chakraborty <redacted>
Cc: Jitendra Kalsaria <redacted>
Cc: Ron Mercer <redacted>
Cc: linux-driver@qlogic.com
---
drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlge/qlge_main.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
From: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us> Date: 2012-07-10 00:09:39
skb->dev is being unnecessarily set during ring init and skb alloc in rx. It is
already being set to the proper value when eth_type_trans is called on packet
receive, and the skb->dev is not referenced anywhere else in the code.
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunbmac.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
From: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us> Date: 2012-07-10 00:09:44
skb->dev is being unnecessarily set by the driver's skb alloc routine (which is
called in init and during rx). It is already being set to the proper value when
eth_type_trans is called on packet receive, and the skb->dev is not referenced
anywhere else in the code.
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sungem.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
From: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us> Date: 2012-07-10 00:09:50
skb->dev is being unnecessarily set during ring init and skb alloc in rx. It is
already being set to the proper value when eth_type_trans is called on packet
receive, and the skb->dev is not referenced anywhere else in the code.
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunhme.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
From: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us> Date: 2012-07-10 00:09:54
skb->dev is being unnecessarily set by the driver on packet recieve.
eth_type_trans already sets skb->dev to the proper value and it is not
referenced anywhere else in the dirver, thus making its setting unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/ll_temac_main.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
From: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us> Date: 2012-07-12 21:19:18
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Jon Mason [off-list ref] wrote:
skb->dev is being unnecessarily set after calling eth_type_trans.
eth_type_trans already sets skb->dev to the proper value, thus making this
unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>
Cc: Christian Benvenuti <redacted>
Cc: Roopa Prabhu <redacted>
This address bounced. Anyone know of an updated address for Roopa or
should they be removed from the MAINTAINERS list?
From: Christian Benvenuti (benve) <hidden> Date: 2012-07-12 21:33:04
Jon,
Roopa is not in the maintainer list anymore.
Sorry about that.
We will update MAINTAINERS.
BTW, the change in enic_main.c looks good.
/Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Mason [mailto:jdmason@kudzu.us]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 2:19 PM
To: David S. Miller
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; Christian Benvenuti (benve); Neel Patel (neepatel); Nishank Trivedi
(nistrive)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] enic: remove unnecessary setting of skb->dev
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Jon Mason [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
skb->dev is being unnecessarily set after calling eth_type_trans.
eth_type_trans already sets skb->dev to the proper value, thus making this
unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>
Cc: Christian Benvenuti <redacted>
Cc: Roopa Prabhu <redacted>
This address bounced. Anyone know of an updated address for Roopa or
should they be removed from the MAINTAINERS list?
Jon,
The change in enic_main.c looks good.
_ Neel
-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Benvenuti (benve)
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 2:23 PM
To: Jon Mason; David S. Miller
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; Neel Patel (neepatel); Nishank Trivedi (nistrive)
Subject: RE: [PATCH 02/11] enic: remove unnecessary setting of skb->dev
Jon,
Roopa is not in the maintainer list anymore.
Sorry about that.
We will update MAINTAINERS.
BTW, the change in enic_main.c looks good.
/Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Mason [mailto:jdmason@kudzu.us]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 2:19 PM
To: David S. Miller
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; Christian Benvenuti (benve); Neel Patel
(neepatel); Nishank Trivedi
(nistrive)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] enic: remove unnecessary setting of
skb->dev
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Jon Mason [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
skb->dev is being unnecessarily set after calling eth_type_trans.
eth_type_trans already sets skb->dev to the proper value, thus
making this unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>
Cc: Christian Benvenuti <redacted>
Cc: Roopa Prabhu <redacted>
This address bounced. Anyone know of an updated address for Roopa or
should they be removed from the MAINTAINERS list?