On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 03:15 -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Eric Dumazet <redacted>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 12:44:01 +0200
quoted
If we still want __refcnt being on cache line boundary, we might find a
better way to accomplish this.
Back to this issue again.
Eric, if you take a look at net-next right now, I left a dummy padding
in dst_entry where the neighbour pointer used to be.
Can you come up with some way to make use of that new space?
If route cache is removed, I believe we can remove all paddings.
Each tcp session will have its own dst_entry, instead of being shared.