Thread (6 messages) flat view 6 messages, 3 authors, 2012-06-26

Re: [PATCH 5/6] tuntap: per queue 64 bit stats

From: Jason Wang <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-26 06:26:42
Also in: lkml

On 06/26/2012 02:10 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 14:00 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
quoted
Yes, looks like it's hard to use NETIF_F_LLTX without breaking the u64
statistics, may worth to use tx lock and alloc_netdev_mq().
Yes, this probably needs percpu storage (if you really want to use
include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h).

But percpu storage seems a bit overkill with a raising number of cpus
on typical machines.

For loopback device, its fine because we only have one lo device per
network namespace, and some workloads really hit hard this device.

But for tuntap, I am not sure ?
The problem is that we want to collect per-queue statistics. So if we 
convert tuntap to use alloc_netdev_mq(), the tx statistics would be 
updated under tx lock which looks safe.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help