Re: [PATCH] net: socket: fixed coding style issues.
From: Ben Hutchings <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-11 17:53:28
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 14:17 +0100, Matthew Shaw wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Fixed an instance where brances are used but not needed, and some lines in the comments and code that exceed the 80 character limit. Signed-off-by: Matthew Shaw <redacted> --- net/socket.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c index 6e0ccc0..2133040 100644 --- a/net/socket.c +++ b/net/socket.c@@ -8,48 +8,48 @@ * Fred N. van Kempen, <waltje@uWalt.NL.Mugnet.ORG> * * Fixes: - * Anonymous : NOTSOCK/BADF cleanup. Error fix in - * shutdown() - * Alan Cox : verify_area() fixes - * Alan Cox : Removed DDI - * Jonathan Kamens : SOCK_DGRAM reconnect bug
[...] I would question whether such lists of bug fixes are worth keeping at all. The names should probably be kept as credits, but the details are ancient history now. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.