[PATCH RFC 0/8] LLDP implementation for Linux · Eldad Zack <hidden> · 2012-06-25
[PATCH 1/8] if_ether.h: Add LLDP ethertype · Eldad Zack <hidden> · 2012-06-25
Re: [PATCH 1/8] if_ether.h: Add LLDP ethertype · Eldad Zack <hidden> · 2012-06-25
[PATCH 2/8] LLDP: Header · Eldad Zack <hidden> · 2012-06-25
[PATCH 3/8] LLDP: Sysctl interface · Eldad Zack <hidden> · 2012-06-25
[PATCH 4/8] LLDP: PDU-handling routines · Eldad Zack <hidden> · 2012-06-25
[PATCH 5/8] LLDP: Output routines · Eldad Zack <hidden> · 2012-06-25
[PATCH 6/8] LLDP: Core routines · Eldad Zack <hidden> · 2012-06-25
[PATCH 7/8] LLDP: Kconfig and Makefile · Eldad Zack <hidden> · 2012-06-25
[PATCH 8/8] 8021q/vlan: process NETDEV_GOING_DOWN · Eldad Zack <hidden> · 2012-06-25
Re: [PATCH RFC 0/8] LLDP implementation for Linux · Eldad Zack <hidden> · 2012-06-25
Re: [PATCH RFC 0/8] LLDP implementation for Linux · Stephen Hemminger <hidden> · 2012-06-25
Re: [PATCH RFC 0/8] LLDP implementation for Linux · Eldad Zack <hidden> · 2012-06-25
Re: [PATCH RFC 0/8] LLDP implementation for Linux · John Fastabend <hidden> · 2012-06-25
Re: [PATCH RFC 0/8] LLDP implementation for Linux · Eldad Zack <hidden> · 2012-06-25

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/8] LLDP implementation for Linux

From: Eldad Zack <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-25 20:05:52


On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Stephen Hemminger wrote:

Since LLDP is a control protocol what is wrong with the existing
implementation in userspace?
  https://github.com/vincentbernat/lldpd/wiki

Well, I don't have a business case here, since I start it on my free 
time out of a mix of interest and curiousity.

In any event, thanks for the feedback!

Eldad

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help