Thread (17 messages) flat view 17 messages, 2 authors, 2012-06-20

Re: 10GBE performance drop with net.ipv4.tcp_timestamps=0

From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-20 09:06:47

Am 20.06.2012 10:41, schrieb Eric Dumazet:
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 10:21 +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
quoted
Am 20.06.2012 09:22, schrieb Eric Dumazet:
Yes, you already told that in subject line.

single tcp flow ?
I use iperf - i think it uses just a single tcp flow. But i'm not sure.
You seem to have a switch or something that drops packets in this case.
You could try to rate limit to 9Gb/s and see if it is better.
Sadly i can't rate limit to 9Gbit/s on the switch.
Here, I roughly have same bandwidth with tcp_timestamps on or off, with
ixgbe cards and net-next kernels.
Mhm strange. Do you have any vague idea what could cause this? Any wrong 
reordering of the packets without tcp_timestamps?

Stefan
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help