Re: [PATCH] bonding: Fix corrupted queue_mapping
From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-08 07:24:02
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 08:47 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 23:15 -0700, David Miller wrote:quoted
From: Eric Dumazet <redacted> Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 08:11:21 +0200quoted
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 23:02 -0700, David Miller wrote:quoted
Hmmm, isn't that what qdisc_skb_cb is for? And even private data is explicitly allocated:quoted
unsigned char data[24];there. :-)Yes, but some other layers can use the same trick so it might collide. Inserting the bond field in qdisc_skb_cb (level0) is safer.Do you suggest that Infiniband does the same thing? :-)I wonder if another way to solve this is not letting ndo_select_queue() method the responsibility to call skb_set_queue_mapping() itself ? (ie removing skb_set_queue_mapping() done in dev_pick_tx()) bonding would not have to save/restore skb queue mapping ? Partial patch : (we have to audit all ndo_select_queue()diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c index cd09819..c6c92d5 100644 --- a/net/core/dev.c +++ b/net/core/dev.c@@ -2368,6 +2368,7 @@ static struct netdev_queue *dev_pick_tx(struct net_device *dev, if (dev->real_num_tx_queues == 1) queue_index = 0; + skb_set_queue_mapping(skb, queue_index); else if (ops->ndo_select_queue) { queue_index = ops->ndo_select_queue(dev, skb); queue_index = dev_cap_txqueue(dev, queue_index);@@ -2391,9 +2392,9 @@ static struct netdev_queue *dev_pick_tx(struct net_device *dev, sk_tx_queue_set(sk, queue_index); } } + skb_set_queue_mapping(skb, queue_index); } - skb_set_queue_mapping(skb, queue_index); return netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, queue_index); }
I must say I dont understand dev_pick_tx() anymore. It seems to ignore skb->queue_mapping (unless device provides its own ndo_select_queue() and this functions is aware of skb->queue_mapping, as correctly done in ixgbe) So commit fff3269907897ee (tcp: reflect SYN queue_mapping into SYNACK packets) works on ixgbe, but probably not on other multiqueue devices. This sounds like a regression to me.