On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 06:35:08PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

Hi all,

On Wed, 30 May 2012 19:41:47 +0930 Rusty Russell [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Mon, 28 May 2012 15:53:25 +0300, "Michael S. Tsirkin" [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:19:54PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:

quoted

disable_cb is just an optimization: it
can not guarantee that there are no callbacks.

I didn't yet figure out whether a callback
in freeze will trigger a bug, but disable_cb
won't address it in any case. So let's remove
the useless calls as a first step.

Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

Looks like this isn't in the 3.5 pull request -
just lost in the shuffle?
disable_cb is advisory so can't be relied upon.

I always (try to?) reply as I accept patches.

This one did slip by, but it's harmless so no need to push AFAICT.

Applied.

This patch exists in two trees in linux-next already ... Davem's net tree
(so presumably he will send it to Linus shortly) and Michael's vhost tree
(is that tree needed any more?).

Yes and I dropped the patch from there, just did not push yet.

 Presumably it is now also in the rr
tree?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au