Thread (8 messages) flat view 8 messages, 3 authors, 2012-05-18

Re: [PATCH] e1000: Reset rx ring index on receive overrun

From: Dave, Tushar N <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-17 23:22:36
Also in: lkml

I am interested in to see if you have actual test case and more importantly test data that shows that kernel and device indexes are not synchronized any more.


-Tushar
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
-----Original Message-----
From: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org]
On Behalf Of Samuel Thibault
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 4:02 PM
To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Allan, Bruce W; Wyborny,
Carolyn; Skidmore, Donald C; Rose, Gregory V; Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P;
Duyck, Alexander H; Ronciak, John; David S. Miller; Jiri Pirko; Dean
Nelson; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] e1000: Reset rx ring index on receive overrun

At high traffic rate, the rx ring may get completely filled before we
manage to consume it.  After it is filled, the kernel and device indexes
are not synchronized any more, so we have to reset them, otherwise the
kernel will be stuck waiting for the wrong slot to be filled.

Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>

---
This is just a patch suggestion, I'm not an expert in network drivers, I
leave to actual driver authors to bake a better version.
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
index 37caa88..77c8dbc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
@@ -3759,6 +3759,21 @@ static irqreturn_t e1000_intr(int irq, void *data)
	if (unlikely(test_bit(__E1000_DOWN, &adapter->flags)))
		return IRQ_HANDLED;

+	if (unlikely(icr & E1000_ICR_RXO)) {
+		/* Receive Overrun */
+		u32 rctl;
+		int i;
+		rctl = er32(RCTL);
+		ew32(RCTL, rctl & ~E1000_RCTL_EN);
+		for (i = 0; i < adapter->num_rx_queues; i++) {
+			memset(adapter->rx_ring[i].desc, 0, adapter-
quoted
rx_ring[i].size);
+			adapter->rx_ring[i].next_to_clean = 0;
+		}
+		ew32(RDH, 0);
+		ew32(RCTL, rctl);
+		adapter->netdev->stats.rx_fifo_errors++;
+	}
+
	if (unlikely(icr & (E1000_ICR_RXSEQ | E1000_ICR_LSC))) {
		hw->get_link_status = 1;
		/* guard against interrupt when we're going down */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the
body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel&#174; Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help