Re: [PATCH 01/12] netvm: Prevent a stream-specific deadlock
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2012-05-14 20:28:08
Also in:
linux-mm, linux-nfs, lkml
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 11:56:04 +0100
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 01:10:34AM -0400, David Miller wrote:quoted
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 14:54:14 +0100quoted
It could happen that all !SOCK_MEMALLOC sockets have buffered so much data that we're over the global rmem limit. This will prevent SOCK_MEMALLOC buffers from receiving data, which will prevent userspace from running, which is needed to reduce the buffered data. Fix this by exempting the SOCK_MEMALLOC sockets from the rmem limit. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <redacted> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>This introduces an invariant which I am not so sure is enforced. With this change it is absolutely required that once a socket becomes SOCK_MEMALLOC it must never _ever_ lose that attribute.This is effectively true. In the NFS case, the flag is cleared on swapoff after all the entries have been paged in. In the NBD case, SOCK_MEMALLOC is left set until the socket is destroyed. I'll update the changelog.
Bugs happen, you need to find a way to assert that nobody every does this. Because if a bug is introduced which makes this happen, it will otherwise be very difficult to debug. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>