[PATCH 00/17] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking V10 · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-10
[PATCH 01/17] mm: Serialize access to min_free_kbytes · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-10
[PATCH 06/17] mm: Only set page->pfmemalloc when ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS was used · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-10
[PATCH 07/17] mm: Ignore mempolicies when using ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-10
[PATCH 10/17] netvm: Allow skb allocation to use PFMEMALLOC reserves · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-10
Re: [PATCH 10/17] netvm: Allow skb allocation to use PFMEMALLOC reserves · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2012-05-11
Re: [PATCH 10/17] netvm: Allow skb allocation to use PFMEMALLOC reserves · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-11
Re: [PATCH 10/17] netvm: Allow skb allocation to use PFMEMALLOC reserves · Peter Zijlstra <hidden> · 2012-05-11
Re: [PATCH 10/17] netvm: Allow skb allocation to use PFMEMALLOC reserves · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-11
Re: [PATCH 10/17] netvm: Allow skb allocation to use PFMEMALLOC reserves · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2012-05-11
[PATCH 11/17] netvm: Propagate page->pfmemalloc to skb · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-10
[PATCH 12/17] netvm: Propagate page->pfmemalloc from netdev_alloc_page to skb · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-10
Re: [PATCH 12/17] netvm: Propagate page->pfmemalloc from netdev_alloc_page to skb · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2012-05-11
Re: [PATCH 12/17] netvm: Propagate page->pfmemalloc from netdev_alloc_page to skb · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-11
[PATCH 13/17] netvm: Set PF_MEMALLOC as appropriate during SKB processing · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-10
Re: [PATCH 13/17] netvm: Set PF_MEMALLOC as appropriate during SKB processing · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2012-05-11
[PATCH 17/17] mm: Account for the number of times direct reclaimers get throttled · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-10
[PATCH 16/17] mm: Throttle direct reclaimers if PF_MEMALLOC reserves are low and swap is backed by network storage · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-10
[PATCH 15/17] nbd: Set SOCK_MEMALLOC for access to PFMEMALLOC reserves · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-10
[PATCH 14/17] mm: Micro-optimise slab to avoid a function call · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-10
[PATCH 09/17] netvm: Allow the use of __GFP_MEMALLOC by specific sockets · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-10
Re: [PATCH 09/17] netvm: Allow the use of __GFP_MEMALLOC by specific sockets · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2012-05-11
[PATCH 08/17] net: Introduce sk_allocation() to allow addition of GFP flags depending on the individual socket · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-10
Re: [PATCH 08/17] net: Introduce sk_allocation() to allow addition of GFP flags depending on the individual socket · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2012-05-11
Re: [PATCH 08/17] net: Introduce sk_allocation() to allow addition of GFP flags depending on the individual socket · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-11
[PATCH 05/17] mm: allow PF_MEMALLOC from softirq context · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-10
Re: [PATCH 05/17] mm: allow PF_MEMALLOC from softirq context · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2012-05-11
Re: [PATCH 05/17] mm: allow PF_MEMALLOC from softirq context · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-14
Re: [PATCH 05/17] mm: allow PF_MEMALLOC from softirq context · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-15
[PATCH 04/17] mm: Introduce __GFP_MEMALLOC to allow access to emergency reserves · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-10
[PATCH 03/17] mm: slub: Optimise the SLUB fast path to avoid pfmemalloc checks · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-10
[PATCH 02/17] mm: sl[au]b: Add knowledge of PFMEMALLOC reserve pages · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-10
Re: [PATCH 00/17] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking V10 · Mike Christie <hidden> · 2012-05-10
Re: [PATCH 00/17] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking V10 · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2012-05-11
Re: [PATCH 00/17] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking V10 · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-11
Re: [PATCH 00/17] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking V10 · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2012-05-11
Re: [PATCH 00/17] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking V10 · Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> · 2012-05-11
Re: [PATCH 00/17] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking V10 · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2012-05-14

Re: [PATCH 00/17] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking V10

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2012-05-11 21:23:54
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 16:45:40 +0100

From my point of view, the ideal would be that all the patches go
through akpm's tree or yours but that probably will cause merge
difficulties.

Any recommendations?

I know there will be networking side conflicts very soon, it's not a
matter of 'if' but 'when'.

But the trick is that I bet the 'mm' and 'slab' folks are in a similar
situation.

In any event I'm more than happy to take it all in my tree.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help