On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:08:58PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
Add tunnel tundevs for tunnel realdevs as needed.
In general the notion is that realdevs may be configured by users
and from an end-user point of view are compatible with the existing
port-based tunneling code. And that tundevs exist in the datapath
arnd are actually used to send and recieve packets, based on flows.
Cc: Kyle Mestery <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms-/R6kz+dDXgpPR4JQBCEnsQ@public.gmane.org>
This seems reasonable at a glance. There are bits I might quibble
with as this gets closer, but the structure seems reasonable.