Thread (20 messages) flat view 20 messages, 5 authors, 2012-05-24

Re: [RFC] net/hsr: Add support for IEC 62439-3 High-availability Seamless Redundancy

From: Arvid Brodin <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-14 18:11:46

On 2012-03-27 15:20, Arvid Brodin wrote:
Hi!
*snip*
2) I have a locking problem that I haven't managed to figure out. This happens
   the first time I send any packet (hsr_dev_xmit() in hsr_device.c:121, called
   from hsr_device.c:147). It happens even if I set skb2 to NULL (i.e. only send
   one copy):

=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.37 #118
---------------------------------------------
swapper/0 is trying to acquire lock:
 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-...}, at: [<901bf38e>] sch_direct_xmit+0x24/0x152

but task is already holding lock:
 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-...}, at: [<901b4d1a>] dev_queue_xmit+0x31e/0x3cc

other info that might help us debug this:
4 locks held by swapper/0:
 #0:  (&n->timer){+.-...}, at: [<9002bc20>] run_timer_softirq+0x98/0x184
 #1:  (rcu_read_lock_bh){.+....}, at: [<901b49fc>] dev_queue_xmit+0x0/0x3cc
 #2:  (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-...}, at: [<901b4d1a>] dev_queue_xmit+0x31e/0x3cc
 #3:  (rcu_read_lock_bh){.+....}, at: [<901b49fc>] dev_queue_xmit+0x0/0x3cc

stack backtrace:
Call trace:
 [<9001c640>] dump_stack+0x18/0x20
 [<90040eac>] validate_chain+0x40c/0x9ac
 [<90041a58>] __lock_acquire+0x60c/0x670
 [<90042f32>] lock_acquire+0x3a/0x48
 [<902201a4>] _raw_spin_lock+0x20/0x44
 [<901bf38e>] sch_direct_xmit+0x24/0x152
 [<901b4c14>] dev_queue_xmit+0x218/0x3cc
 [<9021c2e0>] slave_xmit+0x10/0x14
 [<9021c540>] hsr_dev_xmit+0x88/0x8c
 [<901b4942>] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x3c6/0x480
 [<901b4d34>] dev_queue_xmit+0x338/0x3cc
 [<901e3cd8>] arp_xmit+0x8/0xc
 [<901e4436>] arp_send+0x2a/0x2c
 [<901e4e74>] arp_solicit+0x15c/0x170
 [<901bad0c>] neigh_timer_handler+0x1c0/0x204
 [<9002bc8a>] run_timer_softirq+0x102/0x184
 [<900287d8>] __do_softirq+0x64/0xe0
 [<9002896a>] do_softirq+0x26/0x48
 [<90028a66>] irq_exit+0x2e/0x64
 [<90019f16>] do_IRQ+0x46/0x5c
 [<90018428>] irq_level0+0x18/0x60
 [<9021cc16>] rest_init+0x72/0x98
 [<9000063c>] start_kernel+0x21c/0x258
 [<00000000>] 0x0

   Any idea why this happens? I need help!

I've spent a few days digging into this and the key apparently is NETIF_F_LLTX.

The problem seems to be that HARD_TX_LOCK is called more than once, first for my virtual
hsr device and then, recursively, for each of the slaves in turn. (At least that's where
lockdep complains - at __netif_tx_lock(), that is.)

At first I just could not understand why both the VLAN and the bonding code got away with
recursive calls to dev_queue_xmit() but I didn't. After some gooling (a lot, actually) I
found some references to the NETIF_F_LLTX flag (here's one:
http://lwn.net/Articles/121566/). I realised both VLAN and bonding code set this flag. And
sure enough, if I set it for my hsr device lockdep does not complain any more.

But NETIF_F_LLTX is described as deprecated in both netdevice.h and in
Documentation/networking/netdevices.txt. Is there an alternative solution that I should
use instead?

(To recap, a hsr device is a virtual device which uses two Ethernet devices as slaves.
This gives redundancy with instant failover, and since nodes are connected in a ring
topology, uses less cabling than duplication.)

-- 
Arvid Brodin | Consultant (Linux)
XDIN AB | Jan Stenbecks Torg 17 | SE-164 40 Kista | Sweden | xdin.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help