Re: [RFC] net/hsr: Add support for IEC 62439-3 High-availability Seamless Redundancy
From: Arvid Brodin <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-14 18:11:46
On 2012-03-27 15:20, Arvid Brodin wrote:
Hi!
*snip*
2) I have a locking problem that I haven't managed to figure out. This happens
the first time I send any packet (hsr_dev_xmit() in hsr_device.c:121, called
from hsr_device.c:147). It happens even if I set skb2 to NULL (i.e. only send
one copy):
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.37 #118
---------------------------------------------
swapper/0 is trying to acquire lock:
(_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-...}, at: [<901bf38e>] sch_direct_xmit+0x24/0x152
but task is already holding lock:
(_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-...}, at: [<901b4d1a>] dev_queue_xmit+0x31e/0x3cc
other info that might help us debug this:
4 locks held by swapper/0:
#0: (&n->timer){+.-...}, at: [<9002bc20>] run_timer_softirq+0x98/0x184
#1: (rcu_read_lock_bh){.+....}, at: [<901b49fc>] dev_queue_xmit+0x0/0x3cc
#2: (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-...}, at: [<901b4d1a>] dev_queue_xmit+0x31e/0x3cc
#3: (rcu_read_lock_bh){.+....}, at: [<901b49fc>] dev_queue_xmit+0x0/0x3cc
stack backtrace:
Call trace:
[<9001c640>] dump_stack+0x18/0x20
[<90040eac>] validate_chain+0x40c/0x9ac
[<90041a58>] __lock_acquire+0x60c/0x670
[<90042f32>] lock_acquire+0x3a/0x48
[<902201a4>] _raw_spin_lock+0x20/0x44
[<901bf38e>] sch_direct_xmit+0x24/0x152
[<901b4c14>] dev_queue_xmit+0x218/0x3cc
[<9021c2e0>] slave_xmit+0x10/0x14
[<9021c540>] hsr_dev_xmit+0x88/0x8c
[<901b4942>] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x3c6/0x480
[<901b4d34>] dev_queue_xmit+0x338/0x3cc
[<901e3cd8>] arp_xmit+0x8/0xc
[<901e4436>] arp_send+0x2a/0x2c
[<901e4e74>] arp_solicit+0x15c/0x170
[<901bad0c>] neigh_timer_handler+0x1c0/0x204
[<9002bc8a>] run_timer_softirq+0x102/0x184
[<900287d8>] __do_softirq+0x64/0xe0
[<9002896a>] do_softirq+0x26/0x48
[<90028a66>] irq_exit+0x2e/0x64
[<90019f16>] do_IRQ+0x46/0x5c
[<90018428>] irq_level0+0x18/0x60
[<9021cc16>] rest_init+0x72/0x98
[<9000063c>] start_kernel+0x21c/0x258
[<00000000>] 0x0
Any idea why this happens? I need help!I've spent a few days digging into this and the key apparently is NETIF_F_LLTX. The problem seems to be that HARD_TX_LOCK is called more than once, first for my virtual hsr device and then, recursively, for each of the slaves in turn. (At least that's where lockdep complains - at __netif_tx_lock(), that is.) At first I just could not understand why both the VLAN and the bonding code got away with recursive calls to dev_queue_xmit() but I didn't. After some gooling (a lot, actually) I found some references to the NETIF_F_LLTX flag (here's one: http://lwn.net/Articles/121566/). I realised both VLAN and bonding code set this flag. And sure enough, if I set it for my hsr device lockdep does not complain any more. But NETIF_F_LLTX is described as deprecated in both netdevice.h and in Documentation/networking/netdevices.txt. Is there an alternative solution that I should use instead? (To recap, a hsr device is a virtual device which uses two Ethernet devices as slaves. This gives redundancy with instant failover, and since nodes are connected in a ring topology, uses less cabling than duplication.) -- Arvid Brodin | Consultant (Linux) XDIN AB | Jan Stenbecks Torg 17 | SE-164 40 Kista | Sweden | xdin.com