From: Eric Dumazet <redacted>
Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 07:35:30 +0200
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 17:26 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
quoted
The fast-path for pskb_expand_head contains a check where the size plus the
unaligned size of skb_shared_info is compared against the size of the data
buffer. This code path has two issues. First is the fact that after the
recent changes by Eric Dumazet to __alloc_skb and build_skb the shared info
is always placed in the optimal spot for a buffer size making this check
unnecessary. The second issue is the fact that the check doesn't take into
account the aligned size of shared info. As a result the code burns cycles
doing a memcpy with nothing actually being shifted.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <redacted>
...
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Applied.